crelf

QUOTE(alfa @ Apr 2 2007, 02:55 PM) You can get certified for that now?!? I wonder what the practical portion of the exam is like...

QUOTE(Tomi Maila @ Apr 1 2007, 08:21 AM) ...but it does have one huge benefit (other than Shiner Bock) - it's where NI is. Most of what I get out of NI-Week isn't on the official program, so meeting up with the top R&D people who aren't officially invited to NI-Week is my highlight, and if it was held anywhere else I wouldn't get to see them. Summary: If NI-Week wasn't in Austin, I probably wouldn't go. PS: I feel for you Tomi - I used to fly to NI-week from Sydney and be jet-lagged as hell for half a week - The monring after the Alliance Day party in ~1999 was not pretty...

QUOTE(John Rouse @ Apr 1 2007, 06:35 AM) Whilst I've never met him, I don't think Richard Bitter has anything to be upset about

QUOTE(Ben @ Mar 29 2007, 10:40 PM)

QUOTE(PJM_labview @ Mar 30 2007, 01:14 PM) Solid gold for your solid nuggets...

QUOTE(Jim Kring @ Mar 30 2007, 02:55 AM) ...and I want a gold-plated toilet seat, but that's just not going to happen now, is it darling?

Pretty cool but not stunning. Show me the code - then I'll tell you whether I'm impressed or not

QUOTE(Mikkel @ Mar 28 2007, 05:43 PM) You've got waaaay too much time on your hands

QUOTE(tcplomp @ Mar 28 2007, 03:34 PM) 1234 + asdf (middle row on keyboard from the left) = 1a2s3d4f

QUOTE(Ben @ Mar 28 2007, 06:14 AM) Bugger!

QUOTE(LV Punk @ Mar 26 2007, 09:40 PM) Muuuwwwhaha! QUOTE(David Boyd @ Mar 26 2007, 10:17 PM) Chris, was that a typo or a sly reference to the story? I called her Slaly because she called me clerf. clerf - that's a kinda cool name...

QUOTE(Tomi Maila @ Mar 28 2007, 02:26 AM) I agree.

QUOTE(ChrisMcLennan @ Mar 27 2007, 02:29 AM) You could just use the thread here...

QUOTE(Michael_Aivaliotis @ Mar 26 2007, 07:44 AM) Excellent - thanks Mike :thumbup:

QUOTE(Aristos Queue @ Mar 25 2007, 05:20 AM) All looks good to me :thumbup:

QUOTE(Sally @ Mar 25 2007, 12:40 AM) Yep - put the formula node in the case structure darling.

QUOTE(Sally @ Mar 25 2007, 12:27 AM) Sure Slaly - but please change your "Versions Used" setting in your profile to 8.0 - it's currently set at "8.20" which is why I did it in that version. Mine doesn't use a formula node as that's not the most efficient way to do this task, but it's pretty obvious where is needs to go. http://forums.lavag.org/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=5283''>http://forums.lavag.org/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=5283'>http://forums.lavag.org/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=5283

I was bored, so here's a solution: http://forums.lavag.org/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=5282 Although, I suspect a

QUOTE(Nullllll @ Mar 24 2007, 09:43 AM) RTFM.

For those interested in the World Cup and unable to see it on local TV, check out this live stream (requires Windows Media Player 11). Note: please do not connect to it when Australia is playing, just in case you're using bandwidth that I'm trying to use

Hi George - can you upload it for us to have a look? Sounds corrupt at some level...

QUOTE(Bryan @ Mar 23 2007, 09:31 PM) Solution: move! QUOTE(lraynal @ Mar 23 2007, 06:16 PM) But looking at your answers, I should be the only one not really appreciating this kind of behavior... So long life to Big Brother!!! Not so fast - I think we really need to talk more about this - what metrics really are useful for all users to see, and not just mildy entertaining? As a scientist, I agree that I *like* to see the data, but as a LAVA member I certainly don't *need* to see a lot of the stuff being presented to me. THe only metrics that I find useful are number of posts, number of files in the LAVAcr, years using LabVIEW and the version(s) used, and the number of views of a topic. Do we really want any of the others?

QUOTE(crelf @ Mar 22 2007, 11:49 PM) http://forums.lavag.org/index.php?showtopic=7061&st=0&p=26686entry26686' target="_blank">Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!

QUOTE(lraynal @ Mar 23 2007, 12:03 AM) I'd never really thought about this before, but I think you're right. Metrics are all very important, but I don't think they need to be presented by username. For example: at the bottom of this page are metrics on who is looking at this topic (eg: x members, y visitors, etc) - that's nice to see, but do we really need to see user's names in that list?

QUOTE(Jim Kring @ Mar 22 2007, 03:19 PM) Be afraid... be very afraid...