crelf
-
Posts
5,759 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
55
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by crelf
-
If you can't get to lavag.org and you're not sure if the issue is on our side or ours, follow @lavag on twitter - that's where we'll post updates on our site's health while it's down. We also post links to hot lava topics there, so go follow us here! There's more info on what to expect on the @lavag feed here.
-
That's correct - there's a time limit (I don't know what it is), but if you reply to your own post and no one else has since replied then your reply concatenates to the previous post. You're welcome If you ever have an issue like this, just hit "Report to Moderator", add instructions on what needs to be done, and one of us will take care of it. That's another time-limited thing - you loose the ability to edit your posts after a certain time (again, I don't know what the time limit is), unless you're a Premium Member. Premium Members can edit thier posts without a time limit. I'll take a look at this - I haven't seen this issue before. Thanks for letting us know.
-
If I get a CAR, I post over here. Also, if a thread already exists discussing an issue and a CAR is issued later, I ask the moderators to move the thread to that forum.
-
Active Directory - Get CommonName from UserName
crelf replied to crelf's topic in Calling External Code
Perfect - that's *exactly* what I wanted -
I can get the UserName (aSAMAccountName or otherwise) on a Windows 7 PC pretty easily (from the environment variables), but I need to get the CommonName so I can do some active directory queires - anyone know how to do this? I've attached an example that gets the active directory groups of a user - problem is, I can't get the CommonName to input into it (eg: on my domain, my UserName is "christopher_relf" which doesn't work, my CommonName is "christopher relf" which works fine). Get User\'s Groups.vi
-
See the list of LabVIEW Idea Exchange items that are now "in development" for #labview 2011: http://tinyurl.com/28d6xjl
-
I don't think that the list is small at all - I think it's excellent (and not just because one of my ideas is on it )
-
Looking for the posts on Saving LVClass data to an ini file? They're over here.
-
Yes, it'll at least stop the level of confusion that lead to this thread.
-
RT @jatowler: "To improve the overall performance of #labview VIs avoid displaying & manipulating large arrays" thx, guys http://is.gd/gqEOI
-
Ugh, I'd forgotten about that. Sorry - my method(s) won't work
-
Hmm - maybe list the VIs included in the exe, and then compare the list with the all VIs in memory - those not listed are dynamic? I can see how there would be exceptions though. Or maybe you could open each VI in the exe and get it's caller - those without callers are dynamic? No, because you'd be the caller. Requires more thought I think...
-
Get a #labview snippet in a version as way back as 7.0? Take a look at "GetSnippet". Download and discuss: http://tinyurl.com/2daven8
-
PS: this is the UI that abso was talking about. (it's part of our internal TestStand API reuse package, so it's not available for public use, but it might inspire and idea on what to do): This is a really important post that I don't think should be glossed over. For those not in the know, this patch refers to using LabVIEW 2010 with TestStand. Be fore-warned, and prepared!
-
Arrays are collections of elements that all shal exactly the same properties (the data can be different, but nothing else) - that's why you can't change the background color of individual cells without changing the background color of all the cells. François' right - try a multicolumn listbox.
-
Try one of these.
-
I usually use :-t
-
RT @eyesonvis: Deadline extended! Enter the LabVIEW Example Code Contest (for a chance 2 win iPad!) by October 25. http://bit.ly/LVXCC10
-
Ethics, Charge premium rate for working on bad code?
crelf replied to Grampa_of_Oliva_n_Eden's topic in LAVA Lounge
Depends on your point of view - if it's as the developer and you find working on something you don't want to is worth more, then sure. If you're the customer then you may not care if the code is bad, so it comes down to what value you put on the work. It's a lovely example of capatilism at work - charge alignment with customer's perceived value. Trying to charge a premium just because the code is poor will be more difficult to defend to the customer (unless, of course, they're a LabVIEW programmer and they, in turn, recognize that the code's poor and feel your pain). Your anal-ogy fails in that you should be able to recognise when others' code is far sweeter smelling than your own -
Good idea - thanks Mark. Wow - that's really cool. I mean, there's not much technologically inventive about it, but an excellent application of the technology.
