Jump to content

Michael Aivaliotis

Administrators
  • Posts

    6,214
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    117

Everything posted by Michael Aivaliotis

  1. QUOTE(Jim Kring @ Jun 17 2007, 01:36 PM) It's arrived but still not selling yet. Cool stuff though.
  2. <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1Cwz8-drKU&rel=0"></param><param'>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1Cwz8-drKU&rel=0"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1Cwz8-drKU&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
  3. QUOTE(Tomi Maila @ Jun 15 2007, 01:18 PM) A Certified Tomi Object?
  4. Update on this. It looks like this will be fixed in the next release of LabVIEW.
  5. QUOTE(yen @ Jun 12 2007, 11:07 AM) It's ok be a crazed homicidal maniac... as long as you can spell and capitalize LabVIEW properly ...
  6. Follow up on this one. It appears that the solution is to double-click on the black highlighted text box. This will remove the black "selection" mode. Has been confirmed as a bug.
  7. LabVIEW 8.2.1 Open the attached project. Expand the Untitled Library 1.lvlib Doubleclick on Untitled.vit (it is now in memory) Right-Click on Untitled.vit and select New from Template. Go to the Untitled.vit panel (which was still in memory). You will now see a broken arrow. Click on the broken arrow. The error message provides an explanation but there is no way to fix the problem. The only option is to remove Untitled.vit from memory.
  8. QUOTE(dbyers3 @ Jun 11 2007, 09:00 AM) Actually, I'm thinking of disabling outline mode all together. What do you all think?
  9. Just an FYI on this topic. Some good news. Here is some insider info which confirms that this will be resolved in a future release (don't ask where I got this from). QUOTE
  10. <script src="http://flash.revver.com/player/1.0/player.js?mediaId:233330;affiliateId:0;height:392;width:480;" type="text/javascript"></script>
  11. QUOTE(Aristos Queue @ Jun 9 2007, 02:35 PM) Does this work in an executable?
  12. The key is the generic file header that can always be accessible by any reader. Once you determine which version of the file you are reading, you would then need to select the appropriate datatype to use.
  13. To get computer name:
  14. Everyone. Please switch any threads to Standard Mode until this issue is resolved.
  15. QUOTE(Val Brown @ Jun 7 2007, 03:20 PM) Well, I think that's stating the obvious. If you DO have the wire connected however, and the input is marked as required, then what? Does it make a difference?
  16. QUOTE(Tomi Maila @ Jun 7 2007, 02:11 PM) This doesn't make sense to me. A required input just indicates to the user that they need to connect the wire. The only difference I see is that in one case the wire is connected to the input terminal and in the other case it is not. Perhaps this makes a difference, however the "required" flag by itself does not carry any valuable info for the compiler. Of course, there may be some black magic that only NI knows but at face value, I don't see it.
  17. You can download a free utility that updates your wallpaper automatically just google: automatically change wallpaper to see a slew of freeware tools. If you type ipconfig /all in the Windows Shell command, it will return all you network card info.
  18. QUOTE(BobHamburger @ Jun 3 2007, 09:30 PM) Click on Options>Standard http://forums.lavag.org/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=6009''>http://forums.lavag.org/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=6009'>http://forums.lavag.org/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=6009
  19. QUOTE(yen @ Jun 3 2007, 12:44 PM) So i guess now is fine?
  20. QUOTE(yen @ Jun 3 2007, 08:52 AM) How about now? Does it still work? There are some settings on the forums that cause this and I'm trying to find the combination that causes it. It always works for me so I can't tell myself.
  21. QUOTE(John Rouse @ May 30 2007, 10:32 AM) Don't want to stray the conversation off-topic (great questions everyone , btw). I don't think there's money in LabVIEW book writing. Based on this blog, why would anyone spend the time to publish (besides fame of course)? I think all the old timers with knowledge to share should put efforts in resources like the LabVIEW Wiki where we can combine our resources instead of isolating ourselves. Why should NI be responsible for good books when there are a lot of us out here with knowledge to share. One of the reasons I started the Wiki was so I can have a platform to write my own in-depth articles. Like anything however, it takes time.
  22. I'm not sure about the other stuff but the long build time is probably due to the "Remove type definitions and unused polymorphic VI instances" on the Advanced tab. Un-check that and try again.
  23. If you want to hang out with the LAVA crowd then the Radisson is the place to be.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.