Jump to content

Yair

Members
  • Content Count

    2,850
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    42

Yair last won the day on July 20

Yair had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

227

About Yair

  • Rank
    Extwemely Active

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

LabVIEW Information

  • Version
    LabVIEW 2009
  • Since
    2003

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I recently backsaved a few things from 2020 to 2015, including with classes, so at least there it works. I would suggest trying to save something simpler and if that works, then take only parts of the project (which obviously will load with missing dependencies) and just backsave those, to see where the issue is. With your image stuck at a vi.lib VI, I would also suggest making sure to mass compile the folder again (or at least the error ring folder) and possibly trying to remove the error rings from your code, if you don't have too many. If something would have problems with backsaving,
  2. The Application class has a couple of private methods which can do this (called Global Data.Set and Get) which operate on a name and a variant value (I believe this goes back at least to 2009). I think this should persist across QD calls. Note that you should pick a name which will be different from other things which might exist in the system.
  3. No errors are added to the log when this happens. The errors that are there (the file is attached) are probably partly because of my attempts to manually install and partly because of another annoying bug - I don't recall the exact details, but basically my LV had a non-standard VI server port, and VIPM had trouble connecting to LV. I figured out that was probably the issue (as it happened before), so I changed it in LV to be the standard 3363 and then VIPM could connect, but when installing or mass compiling (can't remember what point exactly) it then failed to connect. I looked at the VIPM s
  4. Currently, with LV 2020 and VIPM 2020.1, I have the following problem: I open VIPM browser and search for any package (like an OpenG or MGI package) I find the package I open its page and select download I get a Windows popup message that it was downloaded almost immediately, but nothing happens if I click the message. The other three buttons on the page remain disabled, so I can't open the package in VIPM to install it. If I take a VIP file from elsewhere and double click it, then VIPM opens it and I can install it. Also, the downloads
  5. NI is trying to release it earlier. See here - https://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW-Idea-Exchange/LabVIEW-LE/idc-p/4030035#M41946
  6. OK - https://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW-Idea-Exchange/Make-the-All-Supported-Properties-property-return-nested/idi-p/4001207https://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW-Idea-Exchange/Make-the-All-Supported-Properties-property-return-nested/idi-p/4001207
  7. Darren, any chance of getting the All Supported Properties property of the Property class (i.e. the property node) to actually return all the supported properties for the current class of the property node, including all of the nested ones? As it is today, that property only returns the top level properties (so it would show a Label property if the node is linked to a class inheriting from Control, but not all the subproperties coming from the Label class). If that's too hard for support reasons, maybe at least adding a new property which will actually return all of them?
  8. I don't use the variant probes, but a quick look at the code (browseVariant.vi) shows that it uses deprecated VIs in the refnum case. It looks like even the new NI VIs (at least in 2015) don't do the whole job (they seem to return the class name of the wire you had before you convert to a variant, rather than the actual class on the wire), so I think you will need a combination of NI's Get Type Information.vi to know that it's a class and OpenG's LVOOP Return Class Name__ogtk.vi to get the class name:
  9. Short version - you're running a 32 bit process on a 64 bit OS which causes a mess as to how to correctly run LPR. Here are a couple of relevant links: https://knowledgebase.progress.com/articles/Article/Running-OS-COMMAND-LPR-EXE-from-within-32-bit-OpenEdge-the-Procedure-Editor-fails-on-64-bit-Windows https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/winprog64/file-system-redirector The first one suggests a solution, although I haven't tried it myself.
  10. Looks like there's a problem in creating new accounts. See this thread - https://forums.ni.com/t5/BreakPoint/Creating-LAVA-Account/m-p/3909178#M31279 I also tried on Windows 10/FF 66 and didn't even get the CAPTCHA, just no response after filling in the details and clicking Create my Account.
  11. Thanks, that looks like it should work. Where did you find the ID part of the URL? That only works if you use one of the apps Anchor supports. I wanted this for people who use other apps, like me.
  12. Can you publish the RSS feed for the podcast so that people using other apps can also subscribe? My understanding is that the process for finding it is described here, under the "Redirect from your old host" section - https://help.anchor.fm/hc/en-us/articles/115001185692-Step-2-Redirecting-your-RSS-feed-to-Anchor
  13. I forgot to mention those. I actually started with those events, but my understanding was that the desire is to discard actions on the items, not opening and closing, and for those the open/close events don't really help (unless you plan on registering for both the open/close? event and for the mouse down? event and hope that LV will always process events in the order of the frames and then you can try relying on the lack of the first event to discard the second). Like I said, I assume making it an indicator would do the job.
  14. I don't know if there's a way to figure out if the click was specifically on the expand symbol (other than starting to calculate yourself, which could get messy with nested elements), but can you just make the tree an indicator instead of a control? This will allow you to expand, but not to select. If the selection option is needed, Shaun's code from above should work. I'm not sure about dragging and other features.
  15. The difference is in the second Q&R function, where version 2 converts the remainder to U16 instead of the quotient.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.