Jump to content

Duplicate OpenG palette object names


Recommended Posts

I've been making a pass through all the LabVIEW palette content on my system, looking for duplicate names between palette objects. Since Quick Drop will only list a single object of a given name, I think it makes sense that all unique palette objects should have unique names. I have come across three OpenG VIs that have identical names to built-in LabVIEW functions (and thus, cannot currently be dropped with Quick Drop):

 

Empty Array? - user.lib_OpenG.libarrayarray.llbEmpty Array__ogtk.vi

Build Path - user.lib_OpenG.libfilefile.llbBuild Path__ogtk.vi

Strip Path - user.lib_OpenG.libfilefile.llbStrip Path__ogtk.vi

 

Currently, these VIs use window titles to define their palette entry names. Would it be possible to update the window titles of these VIs to have different names than the core LabVIEW functions, thereby allowing these three OpenG items to be droppable from Quick Drop?

Link to comment

Quick Drop will list multiple identically-named objects if they are namespaced differently. So one possible solution would be for OpenG to include all of their palette VIs in a library...this would cause both "Build Path" and "OpenG.lvlib:Build Path" to appear in Quick Drop as separate objects.

 

Assuming OpenG does not want to start including palette objects in libraries, I thought the renaming option was a simpler and more viable solution.

Link to comment

The other alternative I noticed (thanks Darren for looking into this by the way) is to change the OpenG VI Window Title name to be "Wait (ms) OpenG".  It appears Quick Drop will find the VI name, but use the Window Title as the text to find it if one exists.  This is why "Wait (ms)" for OpenG comes up, but the primitive "Wait (ms)" (with no .vi file extension because it is a primitive)

Link to comment
This is why "Wait (ms)" for OpenG comes up, but the primitive "Wait (ms)" (with no .vi file extension because it is a primitive)

I think you mean Wait (ms) for OpenG DOES NOT come up, but the primitive Wait (ms) DOES.

 

Here's the conversation on the dark side that caused Darren to look into this:http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/Duplicate-Quick-Drop-Item-Names/m-p/2521400#M766275

Link to comment

Hello everyone!

 

In terms of moving OpenG VIs into libraries (LVLIBs), it could have a lot of benefits.  I wonder what the possible implications and down-sides are:

 

- How can we get existing code to link to the new LVLIB'ed versions of the libraries?

- Will it create any problems for users? Will it cause EXE builds to be larger?

 

In terms of a work-around, adding "(OpenG)" as a suffix to VIs that have the same Palette Name as NI's sounds like it could also be a good idea. Again, I wonder what the possible implications and down-sides are:

 

- Will seeing "(OpenG)" when the user hovers over it in the palettes cause confusion or look bad if none of the other OpenG VIs have "(OpenG)" in their name?

 

Anyone see other considerations or have input on those I've mentioned?



Quick Drop will list multiple identically-named objects if they are namespaced differently. So one possible solution would be for OpenG to include all of their palette VIs in a library...this would cause both "Build Path" and "OpenG.lvlib:Build Path" to appear in Quick Drop as separate objects.

 

Assuming OpenG does not want to start including palette objects in libraries, I thought the renaming option was a simpler and more viable solution.

 

How would it appear in Quick Drop? Would the user be able to visibly distinguish between the OpenG Build Path and the built-in Build Path?  For example, would (or could?) Quick Drop show "OpenG.lvlib:Build Path" or maybe "Build Path (OpenG.lvlib)" / "Build Path (OpenG)".

Link to comment
How would it appear in Quick Drop? Would the user be able to visibly distinguish between the OpenG Build Path and the built-in Build Path?  For example, would (or could?) Quick Drop show "OpenG.lvlib:Build Path" or maybe "Build Path (OpenG.lvlib)" / "Build Path (OpenG)".

 

Palette VIs that are namespaced with libraries (or classes) appear with the library name in brackets, like so:

 

post-4441-0-85620300-1377968914.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Would it create any problems (for Quick Drop) to use brackets in the VIs window title so that it looks a little more like what Quick Drop adds to LVLIB members?

 

Unfortunately, brackets in palette object names are treated special by Quick Drop, so suffixing with "[OpenG]" would not work. Any other delimeters (parentheses, braces, etc.) should work fine, though. I think I'd prefer if we kept brackets as a library name designation, so if you did suffix the OpenG object names, I'd prefer it be with parentheses.

Link to comment
Unfortunately, brackets in palette object names are treated special by Quick Drop, so suffixing with "[OpenG]" would not work. Any other delimeters (parentheses, braces, etc.) should work fine, though. I think I'd prefer if we kept brackets as a library name designation, so if you did suffix the OpenG object names, I'd prefer it be with parentheses.

 

Would you consider this a Quick Drop bug (that brackets in a VI Window Title would cause a failure of QD)? Might want to generate a Hash of the name and use it as the UID/reference for each item that appears in the list, rather than reference by name.

Link to comment
Would you consider this a Quick Drop bug (that brackets in a VI Window Title would cause a failure of QD)? Might want to generate a Hash of the name and use it as the UID/reference for each item that appears in the list, rather than reference by name.

 

I suppose you could consider it a "bug", although this is the first time in Quick Drop's six-year history that I've heard of somebody wanting to include a bracketed suffix in a palette object name and have it *not* refer to the owning library.

 

Speaking of libraries, I just confirmed with Stephen that, if you namespace an existing VI with a library, but leave the VI's location and name on disk unchanged, then existing code that links to that VI should automatically relink to the newly-namespaced VI without issue. We've used this trick at NI on several occasions when adding library namespacing to existing APIs...I see no reason why it wouldn't work for the OpenG libraries as well.

 

So again, the very low-budget solution to this issue would be to figure out the OpenG palette objects that share names with core LabVIEW functions (it looks like there are about 6 of them from the discussion above) and add an "(OpenG)" suffix to their window titles. The more elegant solution would probably be to add libraries to namespace the OpenG VIs.

 

And looking forward, I've never particularly liked palette VIs that have different palette names than their VI filenames (the exception being Merge VIs). Hindsight is 20/20, but I probably would have just named these VIs something like "Build Path (OpenG).vi", with no custom window title/palette object name, from the start.

Link to comment

I discovered another reason, independent of Quick Drop, that these duplicate palette name issues should be fixed. When you right-click on a subVI, you don't get taken to the correct owning palette for identically named items. Right-clicking on an OpenG File VI should show the OpenG File palette, like this:

 

post-4441-0-35427500-1378248328.png

 

When doing this on the "Build Path" OpenG VI, it shows the File I/O palette instead:

 

post-4441-0-78305100-1378248364.png

Link to comment
Speaking of libraries, I just confirmed with Stephen that, if you namespace an existing VI with a library, but leave the VI's location and name on disk unchanged, then existing code that links to that VI should automatically relink to the newly-namespaced VI without issue. We've used this trick at NI on several occasions when adding library namespacing to existing APIs...I see no reason why it wouldn't work for the OpenG libraries as well.

 

That's great! I didn't know about that (or learned about it so long ago I forgot about it)!  That eliminates one of the biggest technical hurdles around moving OpenG into LVLIBs. Now it just takes elbow grease :)

 

So again, the very low-budget solution to this issue would be to figure out the OpenG palette objects that share names with core LabVIEW functions (it looks like there are about 6 of them from the discussion above) and add an "(OpenG)" suffix to their window titles. The more elegant solution would probably be to add libraries to namespace the OpenG VIs.

 

Yeah, might do an incremental fix of adding the "(OpenG)" suffix, as a stopgap.

 

I discovered another reason, independent of Quick Drop, that these duplicate palette name issues should be fixed. When you right-click on a subVI, you don't get taken to the correct owning palette for identically named items. Right-clicking on an OpenG File VI should show the OpenG File palette, like this:

 

attachicon.gifopenggood.png

 

When doing this on the "Build Path" OpenG VI, it shows the File I/O palette instead:

 

attachicon.gifopengbad.png

 

That's a great point, too! And, you just might have (arguably) found another LabVIEW bug ;p

 

Cheers,

Link to comment
That's a great point, too! And, you just might have (arguably) found another LabVIEW bug ;p

It's not a bug. The palettes do not have anything other than names to use as lookup keys. When I designed the shorttcut palettes, I didn't extend this out because supporting multiple items of the same name leads to severe confusion when telling people to drop something from the palettes. Rather than build a bunch of infastructure to try to resolve multiple names, I figured it was better to encourage developers to name things uniquely. And at the time I did it (LV 7.0), libraries were on the horizon to solve any namespacing issues.

Link to comment
It's not a bug. The palettes do not have anything other than names to use as lookup keys. When I designed the shorttcut palettes, I didn't extend this out because supporting multiple items of the same name leads to severe confusion when telling people to drop something from the palettes. Rather than build a bunch of infastructure to try to resolve multiple names, I figured it was better to encourage developers to name things uniquely. And at the time I did it (LV 7.0), libraries were on the horizon to solve any namespacing issues.

 

Makes sense to me :)

Link to comment

Hey Everyone,


I've rebuilt the OpenG File library (v4.0.1.22) with a fix for this -- I've added the "(OpenG)" suffix to the Window Title and palette names.

 

vipm://oglib_file?repo_url=http://www.jkisoft.com/packages

 

Please take a look and let me know if this works well. If so, I'll make the fix for the OpenG Array and Time libraries, too.

  • Like 2
Link to comment

I just updated my OpenG libraries in LabVIEW 2013 and everything looks good. For posterity, the new palette object names I observed were:

 

OpenG Array Palette

Empty Array? (OpenG)

 

OpenG File Palette

Build Path (OpenG)

Strip Path (OpenG)

 

OpenG Time Palette

Tick Count (ms) (OpenG)

Wait (ms) (OpenG)

Wait Until Next ms Multiple (OpenG)

 

With Jim's changes, all 6 of these OpenG VIs are now droppable with Quick Drop, and they display the proper owning palette when you right-click them.

 

Thanks for implementing the fix, Jim!

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.