Jump to content
cpipkin

Two 1d arrays as XY graphs save to TDMS

Recommended Posts

Hello

I am trying to save TDMS files that ideally contain the following:

- 3 xy graphs (each containing two 1d arrays)

- 1 waveform

The problem i'm running into is that when I convert the xy graphs to waveforms, the x-axis is converted to time, which isn't real or useful to me. I've attached screenshots of what the XY graph should look like VS what it ends up looking like with the waveform.

 

How to I make sure the x-axis is preserved so that I can save to TDMS?

 

Edit: VI is included & pictures have been updated to better represent my code.

 

xy-vs-waveform.PNG

 

 

Codeshot.PNG

TDMS Waveform Example.vi

Edited by cpipkin
Included a VI & Pictures have been updated to better represent my code.
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Using things like the dynamic data type, and express VIs is going to be your down fall.  These functions work fine for the majority of the use cases, but having more low level control gives you the features you'll want.  In this case I see a couple of issues where you are trying to provide an array of delta times where this should be a scalar value stating the amount of time between samples.  This information needs to be recorded in the TDMS file and using the TDMS write primitives do this.  That is why the time scale on your graph above is samples since the delta time between samples wasn't recorded, likely because the Write to Measurement File didn't know that meta data was there, since it is write a dynamic data type.

Attached is an example of writing and reading a waveform with TDMS.

Write Read TDMS Waveform.vi

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @hooovahh! Thanks for the feedback. I used that express VI just to make a quick example. I've attached a more representative version of my actual code. I've included the read TDMS of your code.

What do you think? Is there a way to preserve the X-Axis in the TDMS file? If not, any other approaches? I would like to be able to preserve as much data as possible in 1 single file.

 

Codeshot.PNG

TDMS Waveform Example.vi

Edited by cpipkin
vi updated with more clear labels
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ohhh!  This is a different issue all together.  You don't have a Waveform Graph, you have XY graph.  A Waveform graph has every sample be the same distance apart, where XY it is arbitrary.  Attached is an updated version where we write three channels, one for the X one for Array 1 and one for Array 2.  Then when we read we read all values from all three channels, then build them back into a bundle of X and Y values.  I also built that into an array so one XY Graph can show both plots but you may want that on separate plots.

TDMS Waveform Example 2.vi

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Lipko
      Hi all!
      I'm new to the forum and I have a strange issue with reading TDMS custom properties with Labview.

      Creating user properties is working fine using TDMS Set Properties.vi, but I can't read them with TDMS Get Properties.vi. I can read the "standard" properties, and also I do see the properties in DiAdem (dataportal and using script) and also in Excel when I use TDM(s) importer. The property names are not listed when calling TDMS Set Properties.vi without the property name and data type terminals connected.   
      There is no simultaneous file reading or writing.
      I solved the problem with loading DiAdem and running a script, but that's very slow and also not all target machines have DiAdem installed (and no licence either, obviously).
      I also tried with property names such as User Properties\Device_ID, User_Properties/Device_ID in whatever combinations (I look for the property "Device_ID") without success.
      Thank you for any hints in advance!
    • By cpipkin
      Hello,
      I am working on code that will read a waveform of a sound pressure measurement and calculate the octave band levels. I would be incredibly grateful if someone could take a glance at my code to see what I have wired incorrectly...
      The issue I think I'm having: The output of the "Basic Averaged DC-RMS" output wont index when I put it into the for loop. I tried to get around this problem by building arrays for each RMS output and then indexing into the for loop. Doing this doesn't allow me to graph the output... Any ideas as to why the "Basic Averaged DC-RMS" wont index directly?
       
      The code (inspired by new NXG example) is attached, both VI's must be downloaded in order to run the "Octave Band Levels" VI. Also, I'm aware that LV has a toolkit for sound analysis & octave band analysis... but I do not have access to this toolkit, which is why i'm trying to write my own VI. 
      Thanks in advance!
      Octave Band Levels.vi
      Waveform Butterworth Filter.vi

    • By malocascio
      Hi all,
      I am supporting a legacy application in LV2010, running on a realtime PXI controller. The application is throwing occasional TDMS errors, typically -2505, when I do TDMS Flush or TDMS Close operations. The description of this error is simply "LabVIEW failed to write data to the TDMS file," which doesn't really tell me what happened. Every time I write or flush, the same quantity of data is being written, and most of the time, it operates as expected. After iterating for anywhere between 2 and 14 hours, though, it eventually throws the error.
      Does anyone know in more detail what this error means, and how to deal with it?
      Thanks!
    • By Christian Butcher
      Question: I'm trying to determine the 'best' way to structure my data when storing to disk. My data comes from a variety of different sensor types and with quite different rates - e.g. temperature data (currently) as a 1D array of temperatures and a timestamp [time, t1, t2, ..., tn] at maybe 1 Hz and analog waveform data from load cells at data rates ~O(kHz). 
      I also want to be able to read back data from previous experiments and replot on a similar graph. 
      Reading threads on this forum and at NI I'm uncertain if I'll be better pursuing a set of TDMS files, probably one per sensor type stored at the group/channel level, then at the end of an experiment, collating the TDMS files into one master file and defragmenting, or trying instead to write to a SQLite database. (I have nearly no experience using SQL, but no problem learning - drjdpowell's youtube video was already very informative.) An alternative possibility mentioned in a thread somewhere here was to write TDMS files, then store records on which files hold what data in what I understood to be a catalogue-style SQL database.
      Could anyone with a clearer idea/head than me comment on which avenues are dark tracks down which time will be easily lost in failed attempts, and which seem likely to be worth trying?
       
      Background: I'm currently rewriting some code I wrote last year based on the 'Continuous Measurement and Logging'  template/project. The logging in that case was writing to a single, binary file. Keeping my data format in line as I changed sensor arrangement became increasingly annoying and an ever expanding series of block diagrams lead me to start on the 'Actor Framework' architecture.
      I have some initial progress with setting up actors and generating some simulated data, passing it around and getting it from different formats onto a waveform or XY-graph (can be chosen by choice of child class to insert into a subpanel). I'm now looking to write the logging code such that I have basic implementations of several of the components before I try and write out all of the measurement components and so on - I already have a temperature measurement library for an LTC2983 based PCB and so can use that to test (with hardware) inputting 1D arrays, whilst I'm planning to use just the sine wave VIs to test waveform input.
      I'm not so far into this set of coding that anything is set in stone yet, and so I want to at least try and start off in the right direction. Whilst it seems likely changes to requirements or plans will require modifications to whatever I write, it would be nice if those weren't of the same magnitude as the entire (e.g. logging) codebase.
       
      Apologies for the somewhat verbose post.
    • By cpipkin
      Hello,
      I'm using the 9229 and borrowed a community example to log 4 voltage inputs to TDMS. I need to output RMS voltage on channels 1&2 and the wavform on channels 3&4.
      Essentially what I've done is averaged channels 3&4 using the same # of samples that the RMS is averaged, that way I'm able to make sure they are time synchronized (see code attached). Another advantage doing averaging the samples is that I am reducing the amount of data to analyze later.
      When i compare the TDMS read results to the # of samples in the TDMS file there seems to be a discrepancy in time. I tried to add a time stamp to the logged TDMS file but couldn't get it to work. besides using time stamps, Is there an easy way to confirm that I am saving all of the data I am capturing? Eventually i will be logging data at 30min-40min intervals so I want to make sure that i'm not losing data.
       
      TDMS_Logging_Simple_4chan.vi

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.