Jim Kring Posted January 26, 2007 Report Posted January 26, 2007 4960x1600 And I thought my new 3600x1200 setup was pretty slick. Quote
Chris Davis Posted January 26, 2007 Report Posted January 26, 2007 I feel so inadaquate with just 2560x1024 at work and (gasp) 1024x768 at home. Anybody spare some change to upgrade me? Quote
Jeff Plotzke Posted January 26, 2007 Report Posted January 26, 2007 4960x1600 That's sweet! I'm sure everyone will love me when my block diagrams are at 4960x1600 resolution! Quote
Donald Posted January 26, 2007 Report Posted January 26, 2007 I got a LabVIEW (commercial!!!) application with a scary diagram that doesn't even fit on this screen, I wonder what the developer used... Google maps maybe Quote
LAVA 1.0 Content Posted January 26, 2007 Report Posted January 26, 2007 Anybody spare some change Here ya go :2cents: , but I don't think it will help much That is actually alfa's office. If you ask me how I got the photo with the screen content, I'll have to kill you :ninja: Quote
James N Posted January 26, 2007 Report Posted January 26, 2007 I'm in the same boat Chris. My PO was just denied.... heartless penny pinchers. Don't they know how much more productive.. and envied I'd be!? Quote
crelf Posted January 26, 2007 Author Report Posted January 26, 2007 That's sweet! I'm sure everyone will love me when my block diagrams are at 4960x1600 resolution! Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Quote
Ton Plomp Posted January 26, 2007 Report Posted January 26, 2007 And I thought my new 3600x1200 setup was pretty slick. I feel so inadaquate with just 2560x1024 at work and (gasp) 1024x768 at home. Anybody spare some change to upgrade me? Your what? Ton (looking at 1280x1024) Quote
xtal Posted January 26, 2007 Report Posted January 26, 2007 I also thought my new 3200 x 1100 was the coolest until I saw this. I'm certainly not complaining, though. I have lots and lots of room for my diagrams and panels now...and the 10 other apps I might need to run. Quote
Aristos Queue Posted January 26, 2007 Report Posted January 26, 2007 That's sweet! I'm sure everyone will love me when my block diagrams are at 4960x1600 resolution! You're going to be the second bastard to file a bug report about the 16k wire aren't you? Yes, that's right, I have a CAR that says: "If any segment of my wire (no bends) is greater than 32767 pixels then if I right click on it and select "Clean Up Wire" then the wire gets deleted." This CAR was closed as "Not a bug." The general consensus was that LV had responded correctly to such a wire. Quote
Jeff Plotzke Posted January 26, 2007 Report Posted January 26, 2007 You're going to be the second bastard to file a bug report about the 16k wire aren't you? Yes, that's right, I have a CAR that says: "If any segment of my wire (no bends) is greater than 32767 pixels then if I right click on it and select "Clean Up Wire" then the wire gets deleted." This CAR was closed as "Not a bug." The general consensus was that LV had responded correctly to such a wire. A straight wire 32767 pixels long!?! I don't even want to know how someone discovered this... Quote
crelf Posted January 26, 2007 Author Report Posted January 26, 2007 "If any segment of my wire (no bends) is greater than 32767 pixels then if I right click on it and select "Clean Up Wire" then the wire gets deleted." Holy crap! This CAR was closed as "Not a bug." The general consensus was that LV had responded correctly to such a wire. I concur! Quote
Dave Graybeal Posted January 26, 2007 Report Posted January 26, 2007 You're going to be the second bastard to file a bug report about the 16k wire aren't you? Yes, that's right, I have a CAR that says:"If any segment of my wire (no bends) is greater than 32767 pixels then if I right click on it and select "Clean Up Wire" then the wire gets deleted." This CAR was closed as "Not a bug." The general consensus was that LV had responded correctly to such a wire. Rofl, this was the perfect post to come back to after lunch. Truly made me laugh :laugh: It does make me really curious as to what the person that discovered that was creating.... Dave Quote
Ton Plomp Posted January 26, 2007 Report Posted January 26, 2007 It does make me really curious as to what the person that discovered that was creating.... Maybe someone was shortening a part of a wire until the length became -1, and U16 turned that into (2^16)-1. Scripting gone bad :ninja: Ton Quote
LAVA 1.0 Content Posted January 26, 2007 Report Posted January 26, 2007 This CAR was closed as "Not a bug." It's a FEATURE! I wonder what VI Analyzer would report .... Quote
crelf Posted January 26, 2007 Author Report Posted January 26, 2007 It's a FEATURE! I wonder what VI Analyzer would report .... Does not compute! Quote
Grampa_of_Oliva_n_Eden Posted January 26, 2007 Report Posted January 26, 2007 Does not compute! I would think that if the wire does not have an excessive number of bends and it does not pass under any objects, the VIA would not even comment. Ben Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.