LAVA 1.0 Content Posted October 5, 2007 Report Share Posted October 5, 2007 I was wondering how the "ctrl + shift + Run" was working. I have a llb with a large number of VIs, if I open the main VI and hit "ctrl + shift + Run" what is going to be recompiled ? All the VIs in the llb ? or Only the main VI's hierarchy ? The diferece is of course the VIs in the llb which are called dynamically. Link to comment
Aristos Queue Posted October 5, 2007 Report Share Posted October 5, 2007 All the VIs in memory, across the board, including the private ones that are part of LV itself. The only exceptions are VIs that are currently reserved for running. If a VI is not in memory, it doesn't get recompiled. LLBs have no meaning after loading, so the fact that one VI from an LLB is in memory doesn't cause the other VIs in the LLB to be recompiled. Link to comment
eaolson Posted October 5, 2007 Report Share Posted October 5, 2007 I really hope the title of this thread was supposed to be "question about llb and ctrl + shift+ Run"... Link to comment
Grampa_of_Oliva_n_Eden Posted October 5, 2007 Report Share Posted October 5, 2007 QUOTE(eaolson @ Oct 4 2007, 10:18 AM) I really hope the title of this thread was supposed to be "question about llb and ctrl + shift+ Run"... Thank you eaolson! It took me a couple of seconds to see your point. Ben Link to comment
Justin Goeres Posted October 5, 2007 Report Share Posted October 5, 2007 QUOTE(Ben @ Oct 4 2007, 07:23 AM) It took me a couple of seconds to see your point. Either option describes the process pretty succinctly. Link to comment
Grampa_of_Oliva_n_Eden Posted October 5, 2007 Report Share Posted October 5, 2007 QUOTE(Justin Goeres @ Oct 4 2007, 01:53 PM) Either option describes the process pretty succinctly. I will never be able to do a mass compile ever again without it reminding me of 24-hour bug. Imagine the AE's thoughts we they suggest i do a mass compile I they hear me laughing. Ben Link to comment
Yair Posted October 6, 2007 Report Share Posted October 6, 2007 QUOTE(Aristos Queue @ Oct 4 2007, 04:16 PM) All the VIs in memory, across the board, including the private ones that are part of LV itself. I thought it was only VIs in the hierarchy (including vi.lib, of course). Is that wrong (can't check now)? Link to comment
Aristos Queue Posted October 6, 2007 Report Share Posted October 6, 2007 QUOTE(yen @ Oct 5 2007, 06:11 AM) I thought it was only VIs in the hierarchy (including vi.lib, of course). Is that wrong (can't check now)? That is wrong. It is all VIs in memory in all application instances. It always has been in all versions of LV. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now