Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/27/2012 in all areas

  1. No. There is no chance at all that we'll release that. I will tell you that it's titled Primitives for Dummies and has at least a dozen pages. The only part you're wrong about is the watermark on every page. I should point out that the document starts with "Tremble young seeker for thou art entering a secret chamber in the LabVIEW shop of horrors." I don't have much more to say about this except that we keep parts of LabVIEW private because they are not ready for use by the general public or even experimenters. If you want to experiment, I suggest you check out NI Labs. I think it's great that you want to experiment, but there are a lot of Bad Thingsā„¢ that can happen. You can corrupt VIs and not get them back. Or the corruption may have no effect for a long time and then suddenly things start to break in unexpected ways. I'm not telling you to protect you or because I feel NI is threatened; I'm telling you because there's the potential to break things for you, and other people if you release tools that use unstable, unreleased features.
    1 point
  2. Multiply your array values by 255/Z Amplitude for displaying. [e.g Value * Round(255/1.76859)]
    1 point
  3. Sorry I mistyped there, it is 3.7.13. Are you adding any LabVIEW specific C wrapper code to the DLL? Because if you don't or separate that code into its own DLL, it is really just a drop in replacement of the sqlite3.dll. The GCC compiler itself is quite unlikely as it is in itself quite agnostic of the underlaying target platform. My guess would be the MingW C runtime libraries and here specifically the startup stub that wraps your DLLMain() function. It may be possible to avoid that by selecting a different C runtime option or target subsystem. Not sure if the MingW toolchain provides different subsystem options for DLL targets. I'm not really sure what build toolchain they use at sqlite themselves for the released binaries, but I have some doubt that Richard would be using anything not GCC based.
    1 point
  4. 1 point
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.