Jump to content

LAVA 1.0 Content

Members
  • Posts

    2,739
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by LAVA 1.0 Content

  1. If our dreams are the product of our brains and our brains are composed of elements that must adhere to quantum mech, doesn't that dictate that dreams have to adhere with quantum mech?

    Yes I understand that at the macroscopic level the solutions of quantum mech become meaningless.

    So if the answer is Yes, then we can also say the same thing about this thread?

    Ben

    PS: I may not be able to respond to your reply very soon. I have to stuff my brain back were its is supposed to be.

  2. QUOTE(Neville D @ Dec 7 2007, 01:13 PM)

    Hey everyone,

    last post from me in a while..!! Off to sunny New Zealand for a month and then 3 days in Sydney after that!!!

    Talk to you all in January (and for all our colleagues in the Northern hemisphere.. don't sprain your backs shoveling snow!)

    :rolleyes:

    :beer: :beer:

    Neville.

    A trip to New Zealand to see the locations where the Lord of the Ring Trilogy was filmed is about the only reason I would agree to get on a plane again.

    Have fun!

    Ben

  3. QUOTE(alfa @ Dec 7 2007, 09:54 AM)

    ...

    If you will try to look (analyze) at some "sensitive dreams" they will dissapear when you'll try to look at some details, exactly like the collapse of the wavefunction. It is like the interaction between observer and wavefunction.

    ...

    Again I have to recomend The works of Carlos Costenada (sp?) of Don Juan (sp?) fame.

    To become a wizard he had to be able to see his hands in his dreams.

    His luminous beings idea fits right in with quantum mech.

    Ben

  4. QUOTE(bono02 @ Dec 4 2007, 02:07 PM)

    Thank you for your answer. I tried several times, but the motor only moved a bit.

    I tried these steps (stepper motor) with absolute contouring: 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

    with velocity 137795 steps/rev equal to 13 RPS

    I don't know why. I think this is the fastest speed of the motor, because if you increase

    the speed the motor will not move anymore.

    I read in the manual that "no consecutive points can differ by more than 2^15-1", and my steps

    are just fine, and also it said that the data in-between two points will be spline-interpolated.

    Is it possible to have a position (a b c d e..n) and then just by giving the time from a to n (with the velocity is derived automatically)?

    Btw, about the maxon motor, are you using the API provided or you directly drive it using motion controller?

    Here with me I have EPOS 70/10 and Maxon motor EC 45.

    You have to make an array with points by yourself andyou should not change the updaterate of the contouring points to change the velocity...

    The data inbetween two points are spline interpolatet, thats true. But this is not like a S-Curve move! So you will have big accelleration when you start a move with big velocity...

    If you just send points 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000, then it tries to move always 1000 steps in the updaterate of the countouring points...

    When you don't have a closed loop with your stepper motor, it is possible that you loose points...

    In the contouring mode you can not just give a target position and a velocity. If you will do that you have to change to the absolute or relative position mode. Then you can enter the target, a velocity and start the move...and the S-Curve also work in this mode...

    QUOTE(bono02 @ Dec 4 2007, 02:07 PM)

    Btw, about the maxon motor, are you using the API provided or you directly drive it using motion controller?

    Here with me I have EPOS 70/10 and Maxon motor EC 45.

    I use the API provided..

  5. I believe you are correct for bits 0-7.

    I created a simple VI with 10 terminals, an error in and an error out connected on the BD. As I moved the Error In input from terminal to terminal, the least significant bits changed in my Error Out flags to the index of the Error In flags in the array. As I changed the number of terminals, the number of bits increased as I placed the Error In at the top-left terminal of the pane.

    When I used more than 12 terminals, the least significant bits went to zero. The only thing I changed was the number of terminals and I let LabVIEW automatically reassign the positions. I did not see any other flag bits change when using > 12 terminals.

  6. QUOTE(Bab @ Dec 5 2007, 04:51 AM)

    So you see how many thing you must modify in order to set the colors of one control the way you really want it. If you have many controls – maybe in a settings window with many tabs…

    And if you have a rather large application with many Front Panels. It takes quite some time.

    If no one know of a way, I guess I'll be able to automate the coloring of Booleans and Text-Class Objects at least.

    Are you trying to make a UI where the operator can customize the colors on the fly, or are you trying to automate (script) changes while using the development environment? If you're doing this to speed up making changes in the development environment, consider creating strictly typdefed controls. It takes some up-front planning, but makes changes simpler later on. Place these as needed, then update the typdef once to change all instances.

    If your application is going to run on more than one machine or be used by more than one or two operators, you may want to use system colors on your controls, indicators and backgrounds. The UI will then match the OS settings for colors and will behave like larger commercial based apps.

    Just an idea...

  7. QUOTE(Yen @ Nov 29 2007, 12:26 PM)

    ...

    You might get higher accuracy with a timed loop, but I'm not sure if it's supported on the cFP.

    Yes it is supported but it is not any faster.

    For fast signals I have used a counter timer module to measure the period.

    It also sounds like the original questioner, is reading from all of the DI lines and not just one. If this is the case, either change the code to read only the single DI line or use an index array to pull out the channel of interest and then follow Yair advice.

    Ben

  8. I saw something interesting at the bottom of a LAVA WIKI page. Apparently you can close an array of references in one shot by passing the array (of references) directly to the Close Reference vi.

    I tried it... but got a conflicting class error. Can anyone shed a bit of light on this?

    Thanks!

    RayR

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.