Jump to content

Bryan

Members
  • Content Count

    234
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Bryan last won the day on April 5

Bryan had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

11

About Bryan

  • Rank
    Very Active

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

LabVIEW Information

  • Version
    LabVIEW 2016
  • Since
    1999

Recent Profile Visitors

1,717 profile views
  1. I'm attempting to get LabVIEW 2018 along with DAQmx and VISA installed on a machine (virtual) running Centos7 and am wondering if anyone else is doing similar. The main problems I've run into, by following NI's instructions for DAQmx and LabVIEW 2018 support is that it appears some of the DAQmx tools don't install (e.g. "lsdaq") and the additional NI software doesn't appear in the "Applications >> National Instruments" Gnome GUI menu. I can access serial devices once NI VISA is installed (after adding myself to the "dialout" group), but cannot see or access any DAQmx devices using their method in the link above. I have had some success using previous versions of DAQmx for Linux, but ran into issues and conflicts between modules used VISA and DAQmx. At any rate... I'm wondering if anyone has gotten something LV2018, VISA and DAQmx to work on Centos7 or RHEL7 yet... and if so, what issues/fixes/workarounds you had to do in order to get it to work.
  2. What type of serial communication are you using? RS232, RS485, RS422, I2C, SPI, ETC? The type you are using will determine whether it's physically possible to have multiple masters/slaves on the same connection. If you're using a compatible serial connection, yes... LabVIEW can do what you're asking. As far as how... there are already lots of examples built into LabVIEW and on the internet.
  3. Your request is too vague. Please provide more information as gb119 had stated, otherwise we won't be able (or willing) to help you. Your request reads like: "Hey, I want you to help me come up with a thing that does stuff for free by the end of the month. Okay? Bye-bye!" Otherwise, it seems like you're (vaguely) asking for either free labor or trying to get someone to complete a homework assignment for you.
  4. Okay... I'll bite just because I'm curious. While I was reading your post on how you fixed it, I was thinking of all of the times that I've reviewed code and shook my head when I see that type of programming.
  5. How specifically are you trying to create the folder? I'm using LabVIEW 2016 on Windows 7 and just tried creating a folder named "Blah 1.1" on my desktop. I did it using the "Create Folder" node located in the "File I/O" >> "Adv File Funcs" palette and it worked for me. If you're using Windows 10 and LV 2017, I'm not sure if one of those could be the culprit.
  6. With good reason! We "y's" are pretty sketchy.
  7. I think he'll be cool with it.
  8. I tried to log into the Wiki using my LAVA username/password and it wouldn't let me. So then, I tried to reset my password by specifying my username and email address. It said that there was no email address recorded for my username. Next, I tried creating an account with my username, and of course it won't let me since "Bryan" already exists. So, I gave up and went with "SouthPaw". But, I would still like to access the Wiki under my LAVA username. Would it be possible for a Wiki admin to make that happen? If it's too much of a pain, I can just stick with "SouthPaw".
  9. Loving this central location of organized and searchable LabVIEW knowledge! (Just like LAVA.😁) I've made a couple of small contributions to this so far. Mostly clicking on "Random Article" and reviewing it for typos and broken links. I set somewhat of a personal goal of trying to do this at least once per workday. Every little bit helps, right? Granted, they're not contributions on a grand scale yet, (i.e I'm not creating articles, etc.) but maybe I'll get there. This is my first time contributing to a Wiki of any kind, so I'm a n00b at it.
  10. Judging by the poll results thus far, it looks like there is a LOT of interest in having a LAVA code repository for those that are not using VIPM Pro. That's to be expected though. If a public repository were to be set up somewhere, I'm assuming that JKI would have the option of adding it to the list of canned repositories for the Pro and Free versions if they so choose.
  11. From my experiences, TS seemed to be overkill for a lot of applications with which I have been involved, like trying to swat a fly with a Buick. Add to that the additional cost of deployment/debug licenses for multiple test stations, the bill goes up quickly. Learning curve also comes into play as TS has seemed to become its own programming language and is not as easy to learn as LabVIEW for those without the budget or time to take the training classes. With a "roll your own", after the initial time investment of creating a test sequencer in LabVIEW, you can deploy to as many stations as you want without the cost of additional deployment licenses by just building EXEs. Where I'm currently working, TestStand is just starting to gain a foothold, but ease of deployment and cost of deployment licensing has been a source of contention. Now, my opinions are based solely on my experience with using TS on and off for several years without formal TS training. Ironically, a couple of my coworkers and myself are going to be taking a TestStand classes within the coming weeks, and I'm interested in whether my personal opinion (and those of my coworkers) will change. At my previous employer, we still had a system running the precursor to TS: Test Executive. We had kept updating it until we ran into an incompatible version of LabVIEW, then just "froze it in time". Nobody there was very familiar with TestStand and how much it would take to do a migration as the station tested a large variety of boards. Because there was only one operating station, the risk of downtime for migration was considered too great, so it was never done. Test Executive seemed so much simpler and a better match for the needs at the time. A second station was created to do the same as the one running Test Executive. Test Executive wasn't compatible with the newer version of Windows, and they still didn't want to go the TS route, so we ended up going with a LabVIEW-based test sequencer from CalBay (now Averna) called "iVVivi". I became very well versed in iVVivi and it was definitely simpler than TS. It also had an integrated LabVIEW OOP-based HAL, which was very attractive. However, in some respects it was TOO simple and required some creative LabVIEW routines to mimic some functionality available with Test Executive. I don't believe iVVivi is even supported anymore, so they may eventually be forced to go the route of TS. Or, beg NI for the password to access/update the protected VIs to recompile in later LV versions.
  12. Here's another quick and dirty example just using local variables and two separate while loops. I don't like using sequences and local vars in practice myself, but this is just a way to show you a simple way to control parallel loops. It's quirky, but I hope it gives you an idea. There are much better ways to implement parallel loop control and communication, but I just wanted to provide a quick example for you. The "Stop" button is set up to use latch functionality, which isn't compatible with having it used as a local var, so I had to create a separate indicator for "Stop All" to "hold" the value to be used by the second loop. Please don't use this as the best example as it doesn't really show good LabVIEW programming practice, but will at least show you what's needed for parallel loops. Again, I hope I've helped you out! Untitled 2.vi
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.