Jump to content

Wiring the way it oughta be...


Recommended Posts

Posted

QUOTE(PaulG. @ Aug 23 2007, 12:48 PM)

STOP POSTING STUFF LIKE THIS!!!

Every time someone posts a link about a bigger monitor someone writes a block diagram to fill it up.

But wouldn't that just be WONDERFUL??? You could finally fit the entire application onto one block diagram. Oh yeah! :thumbup: :P

Posted

QUOTE(dsaunders @ Aug 23 2007, 10:14 PM)

But wouldn't that just be WONDERFUL??? You could finally fit the entire application onto one block diagram. Oh yeah! :thumbup: :P

I just wondered how it would be possible to code a recursion in a single block diagram? :D

Posted

QUOTE(dsaunders @ Aug 23 2007, 04:14 PM)

But wouldn't that just be WONDERFUL??? You could finally fit the entire application onto one block diagram. Oh yeah! :thumbup: :P

That's not funny.

Well, it's kinda funny in a dark, haha Pulp Fiction-esque "bring in the gimp" sort of way ...

I've had to work with code that someone thought would be cool to fit on dual 19" monitors. The case statements stretched about 2K pixels wide. :blink:

As we said when we were kids: "About as funny as a heart attack". :)

Posted

QUOTE(orko @ Aug 23 2007, 03:27 PM)

Yeah baby, I'll dance all over that function pallette. Gotta use the tippey toes to get down the context menus though.

Posted

QUOTE(Justin Goeres @ Aug 24 2007, 01:40 AM)

This brings to mind something that I say to my engineers at least once a week: "Just because you can, doesn't mean you should."

Posted

I can picture a figure skater, with special shoes, leaping and wiring and it looking real great from a gee-whiz standpoint, I'd love to see it. Not very practical for day to day.

Posted

QUOTE(Mike Ashe @ Aug 24 2007, 11:08 AM)

I can picture a figure skater, with special shoes, leaping and wiring and it looking real great from a gee-whiz standpoint, I'd love to see it.

ga39.jpg

Posted

QUOTE(i2dx @ Aug 23 2007, 03:41 PM)

LabVIEW 8.5. Read the Upgrade Notes on "recursion".

QUOTE(Justin Goeres @ Aug 23 2007, 10:40 AM)

This reminds me of AQ's old story about the "feature" where LabVIEW would crash if a wire greater than 65,536 pixels in length had a bend in it (or something along those lines).

The full story is this... a user filed a bug report that "If I popup on a wire and select 'Clean Up Wire', if the wire is over 16k pixels long, LabVIEW just deletes the wire." I rejected the bug report on the grounds that LabVIEW had done the right thing to clean up the wire.

Posted

QUOTE(Aristos Queue @ Aug 24 2007, 01:35 PM)

"If I popup on a wire and select 'Clean Up Wire', if the wire is over 16k pixels long, LabVIEW just deletes the wire."

Sounds like expected behaviour to me :thumbup:

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.