Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. Today
  3. Your experience seems quite different than mine. I get never the soundless plop disappearance, but that might be because I run my shared library code during debugging from the Visual C debug environment. But even without that, the well known 1097 error is what this wrapper is mostly about and that happens for me a lot more than a completely silent disappearence.
  4. Yesterday
  5. Norton antivirus decided to remove all of my lvlibp files that I copied from our self-hosted gitlab repo. It seems that it takes issue with the URL of the repo and the newness of the files. Here is a post about WS.Reputation.1: https://community.norton.com/en/forums/clarification-wsreputation1-detection They suggest that developers set up auto-protect exclusions for their project directories.
  6. It's a start. Humor and the recognition that the world is moving on outside the ivory tower...
  7. Broadcast Actor.zip Hello All! I'm looking for a little bit of feedback on an Actor I've put together. The zip file attached contains an Actor called "Broadcast Actor". I know the idea of a "broadcast" partially goes against the AF rules but bare with me. The reason I put this together is because the idea of an abstract message was driving me a little crazy. I probably haven't had it properly explained to me but in any case I decided to try and build something that accomplished a similar task as an Abstract Message while also maintaining the low/zero coupling abstract messages provide. I do know Interfaces are out and about in LabVIEW 2020 but this approach is for older code bases that we can't quite upgrade yet. I loosely based this approach on DQMH which has an interesting architecture for messages going "up the tree" using broadcasts (user events), that parent modules register for when they start up. I figured something like this could also be implemented in an Actor. The attached broadcast actor has a message that returns its own populated "Event Cluster". Calling actors can call this message and are returned this "Event Cluster". The parent actor can then register for all of the events of the child actor in their Actor Core. I know reply messages are kind of discouraged in AF but this also felt like an okay way to use them. Once the child actor is up and running it can call it's own broadcasts which the parent can hear and do something intelligent with. My understanding of "low coupling" is limited, but I *think* this approach would prevent the parent actor from being loaded into memory if we are just trying to load the child actor. Maybe I'm way off or maybe this has been done before but it felt like a way to not have to use abstract messages (a barrier for some people to adopt AF), but also allow for low coupling between the actors themselves. Any and all feedback is welcome. What am I missing? -John Hoehner
  8. Last week
  9. Excellent point. I will propose to NI upper management that we take every single bug fix in the latest LabVIEW version and patch that same fix into every previous LabVIEW version we've ever released. I'll let you know how the proposal goes.
  10. It is a different product. It's like if a car company messed up some component and said: sorry, we fixed it the new model. But, hey no ill intent here, just a business model.
  11. Hi Friends, I am facing issue in labview programming. My vi read csv file in a folder and plot it in waveform graph. Initially i have twenty csv file in that folder, while runnning my vi some more csv files will be added to that folder. The problem is only twenty csv file initially placed got read, later added csv files were not read by labview. Condition: Once my vi starts running, the files will be automatically added to that folder. Because i am running an experiment which stores data in the form of csv file to that folder. How to keep on read the csv files continuosly while my experiments stores series of csv files.
  12. I browsed through all the properties and methods of Call Library object and didn't find such scripting analogue. Seems like VI Server doesn't expose that specific property. Yes, like any other option, I mentioned above. Tried to open my DbgPrintf sample VI from another machine and all the parameters are in place. If you don't have extFuncGenNoWrapperEnabled=True and extFuncShowMagic=True in your .ini, then the option is "invisible" in the menu or on BD, but it's there. 🙂
  13. I'm seeing A LOT of these when re-creating Block Diagrams. It's like LV has no error support at all. If you enable 'dprintf' options in 'LabVIEW.ini', you can at least get some information about reason of the failure.
  14. No need. I will explore this. From experience; a misconfigured CLFN usually results in LabVIEW disappearing without a whimper (either immediately or at some random moment) so i don't see much of a reason to have error checking and wrappers enabled at all. Especially if there is a performance benfit, no matter how minute. It doesn't seem to have a scripting counterpart. Is that correct, or have I just missed it? Is the setting sticky, or does distributed source code require the INI setting too?
  15. No need to assign ill intent. We screwed that up, and we fixed it in LabVIEW 2020.
  16. So you understand the gcc source code? Wow! Just wow!
  17. Isn't that common knowledge in our field? When I attended Technical University, that was one of mandatory classes. In case of LabVIEW, the compiler is LLVM. Meaning anyone who looked into clang also looked into that. The amount of developers who looked into CLang or GCC isn't as small as you suggest. This is actually quite common, if a job requires that. I used LLVM as well at some point, ie. I worked on optimizations performed on Intermediate Language tree. And it so happens that in "Heap Peek", you can look at that IL for any VI.
  18. Are you really wanting to tell me that you understand how a C compiler works? Because that would be impressive!
  19. I work 5 years as labview 'developer' and when someone from other technologies asks me how this compiles and really works my answer is i ve no idea. When on the other side open technologies give much deeper ride and control. It might be due to my limited understanding of LV but detailed information is not there on official NI forums. I guess it is up to discussion if You need low level understanding how LV or other technology works. In my case as sw engineer I always want to know how things work, and the longer i work as engineer i realize i ve no idea how 90% of things work
  20. Even when Error Checking is set to Disabled, LabVIEW still enters ExtFuncWrapper to do some basic checks before the target function is called. A few internal functions, such as _clearfp and _controlfp, are being called also. Thereby disabling "Generate Wrapper" option should make CLFN a little faster, than disabling Error Checking. You can take it like you're calling a built-in yellow node (not taking into account the called function's own speed, of course). I did not do concrete benchmarking to compare these two options. If there's an interest, I could check this out.
  21. It's like moving the Expression Node back in some subpalette of the Mathematics functions that is not existing in the Base LabVIEW version (https://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/Expression-Node/td-p/3974820). Completely uncalled for, but, hey, AQ doesn't think that text-based mathematics should even be allowed in LV, so what do we know?
  22. Interesting. How does this feature compare with disabling the error checking on the Error Checking tab?
  23. Hello I am quite new to labview and I have some questions regarding labview. We have came up with a simulation build in labview as shown in the folder. However, we will be making use of Myrio to connect current and voltage sensors to send the data to labview when labview is running. We are currently having difficulties trying to search if it is possible to send the wave files and the popout messages ( messagebox.vi and Player2Wins.vi) to NI Dashboard for Labview in Ipad by using myrio. Is it possible for myrio to store wave files and the additional VIs and sending these to NI Dashboard for Labview? Otherwise, it is possible for Labview to send the entire program.vi, messagebox.vi and Player2Wins.vi to cloud and people are able to see the GUI in program.vi remotely? ( We have found information like Labview web services etc. We hope that people are able to view our GUI and press the " Press start" button as well as closing the popout messages in a website not from our local network). I sincerely apologize if what I am asking does not make sense to people who are reading this. I hope that someone will help me with this as it is very difficult for me to do and I need some guidance from people who are familiar with these. Thanks for taking your time to read and your reply. Simulation_Build_(3).zip Pop-up_Message.vi Player2Wins.vi
  24. I didn't mean to indicate that you had to wire the return value. I actually never even tried that as it seemed so out of touch with anything. What I do believe to remember however is that LabVIEW required you to wire the left side of parameters. However that's 20 years ago and it could just as well have been the CIN node. Much of the object handling for the CLN was inherited from the CIN node and there you don't have a return value. In fact I'm pretty certain that the return value of the CLN is basically simply a parameter as far as the node object is concerned, in order to be able to reuse much of the CIN node object handling. The fact that the first parameter is specifically reserved for the function return value is most likely mostly a special casing for the configuration object method and the run object method of the CLN. Most other methods it simply inherits from the common object ancestor for the CIN and the CLN.
  25. 0_o

    VIWeek 2020

    Thanks for a delightful event
  26. I checked that in LabVIEW 3.1.1 and it doesn't require the Return input terminal to be connected to some constant. I also tried LabVIEW 3.0 and 2.5 but I don't see CLF Node there, only CIN, so can't check there. Got the same in LabVIEW 4.0 (in fact it's a demo version, but DLLs are callable). I still think, there's some sort of a bug, because in LabVIEW 7.1 and 8.0 when you created that unnecessary constant on the left, connected it to CLFN and changed the Return type back to void, the VI's Run arrow becomes broken. The same applies to the wire from the constant to CLFN. But in LabVIEW 2009 and higher the Run arrow is fine and LabVIEW allows to run the VI despite oddity with the CLFN (look at the image above). This is the screenshot from LV 8.0: Might be an omission when porting to the new managers interface?..
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.