crelf

QUOTE(Aristos Queue @ Oct 31 2007, 09:06 AM) ...dont' forget to multiply the area of subdiagrams (in sequences) by the depth of the number of sequence pages.

Hi ben5248 - I've got some brand new equipment that you might be interested in. All we've done to it is take it out of the box and test it: Qty 1 NI 9201 – 8 channel +/-10V cRIO AI Module (list price = $US329) Qty 2 NI 9932 – Strain relief & high voltage connector kit (list price = $US25) Qty 2 NI 9934 – 25-pin Conn. Kit, screw term conn. and DSUB shell (list price = $US109) Qty 1 NI 9937 – 4-pos controller power supply plugs (quant 10) (list price$US95) Qty 1 NI 9936 – POS screw terminal plugs (10) (list price = $US95) Qty 1 NI 9901 - Desktop Mounting Kit (List price = $US49) That's a total list price of $836 - I'd be happy to let it all go for $500 plus postage. If you're interested, please send me a PM.

Not really a bug per se, but has the LAVA site slowed down dramatically in the last week or so? I thought it was the link at my hotel, but it seems to take ages, irrespetive of my link speed. The banner seems to load okay (takes 4 - 5 seconds), but then the rest takes anywhere between 15 and 45 seconds.

Speaking of people imitating famous people, don't these two gents look similar? Ted Allen Justin Goeres ...not that there's anything wrong with that.

QUOTE(PJM_labview @ Oct 30 2007, 11:44 AM)

Imagine the poor guy renovating his bathroom...

OK - I'm not a .net person, but I've been posed a question: can someone programming a .net component put data on the error cluster? I've got a client who have in-house c# developers and the LabVIEW guys are wrapping their .net components - they're currently spewing errors out and then putting them on the error cluster in the LabVIEW wrappers. I was wondering if they could be put there in the c# code and then the LabVIEW guys could create a custom error code file so it's all seemless. Seems kinda pointless to me... (probably cross-posted to NI Forums)

QUOTE(Mathew_Wellington @ Oct 29 2007, 04:19 PM) ...and the brand of boots that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paddington_Bear' target="_blank">Paddington Bear wears

The easiest way is to use "Format into String" wit multiple %s statements in your format specifier - let me know if you're having issues and I'll code something up for you. PS: at first glance, your string format looks like the standard GPS NMEA 0183 RMB format - you can find more info here.

A cracker from Tripod's Kiwi Cousins: "Flight of the Conchords" :!: warning: quite rude

QUOTE(Mathew_Wellington @ Oct 28 2007, 05:31 PM) Kia Ora Mathew Wellington, or is that Mathew in Wellington? QUOTE(beckerg @ Oct 28 2007, 07:25 PM) As a daily reader of the various topics, I discuss many of it with a colleague. Welcome G! I'd love to hear what you and your colleague come to in your discussions If you have a little time, we'd appreciate you guys adding a comment here or there - it all adds to the conversation and I'm sure what you come up with might be crucial for others' education too :thumbup:

QUOTE(gronfelt @ Oct 28 2007, 05:01 PM) Please post your code so we can try to find out what the problem is.

...you've ten thousand spoons, and all you need is a knife. (and then you find out later that a spoon would have done just fine )

QUOTE(Yen @ Oct 28 2007, 04:05 AM) Well, I suppose that will work, but it means that you need to keep track of what's valid and invalid for each subVI that the checking algorithm is in, so keep it tracable.

QUOTE(Tomi Maila @ Oct 26 2007, 09:34 PM) That's not really going to work, especially if you have float inputs. The real answer is no. That said, I'd like to see this a future feature of LabVIEW...

QUOTE(Norm Kirchner @ Oct 26 2007, 12:04 AM) I've created an advanced image processing function that filters out the [censored] part of the image - if anyone wants to know what Norm said, send me a blank cheque made out to "cash"...

QUOTE(Yen @ Oct 24 2007, 03:40 AM) I totally agree with Yen - you need In Range and Coerce: as soon as your signal goes out of range, the Boolean output will flip letting you know that your signal has "started". Although Yen's suggested -2 and 2 range might work, I suggest you make it as small as possible without including the noise on your signal.

QUOTE(silmaril @ Oct 24 2007, 06:49 PM) Sure, and with scripting I think you can find the position of tunnels too, so that's certainly possible.

QUOTE(valipetricele @ Oct 24 2007, 09:24 PM) If you're writing a lot of data often to the graph, you can "defer panel updates" <- do a help search for that.

QUOTE(Justin Goeres @ Oct 24 2007, 09:39 AM) Absolutely! All you'd need to do is step down into the deepest structure, get references to all the objects, get their footprints, move them to the top left (+ some arbitrary border), resize the structure, and then step up a level and continue. You'd of course need to look at parallel structures too, but I don't think it'd be that difficult. The only thing that might take a bit more thinking is the positioning of tunnels once you've resized their structures.

QUOTE(neB @ Oct 24 2007, 04:33 AM) anytime! Actually, my wife sent it to me - she used to be a librarian - quite different to a green-cardigan-wearing shoosh-monster...

QUOTE(Jim Kring @ Oct 20 2007, 04:26 PM) Wow - that's a significant event in the world of Danaher...

Here's another one from Tripod: