Jump to content

Neil Pate

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by Neil Pate

  1. Joe, I was able to fix my issue by re-creating the single VI that was not working properly. Thankfully I have only seen this issue on one occasion, but now several others have also reported very similar problems. This is not a very satisfying situation where you no longer have faith that the code is actually going to do what you tell it to do...
  2. Sorry Chris, never got the the bottom of it. I am glad I had read this thread before it happened to me as otherwise I would have thought I was going crazy! I have a suspicion (based only on a tiny bit of evidence) that the problems arise when renaming class VIs. I am pedantic about having the VI name match what the VI is actually doing, so will often rename a VI as my code/API iterates. Now normally this does not cause any problems, however I have seen instability when I rename a VI to something that a different VI used to be called. It's like there is some form of stale code path somewher
  3. I usually unbundle and then rebundle. It depends... sometimes I do but it depends on how deep in the call hierarchy the code exists in. If I have a Manager type class then I normally like to not expose the inner working (i.e. private classes) so that the "Block" class never actually gets exposed to the outside world, i.e. there is no get/set "Block" accessor in Executive Functionality. This can be a pain though as it often feels like you are writing the same method for various levels of the hierarchy.
  4. Yeah I also think something is fishy. I know Registry IO is cheap, but I would prefer it not to be going on all the time. Perhaps will try and re-install/repair the License Manager
  5. Didn't know about that option in the LM! Just checked it, and mine is blank (as I would expect as this PC has never been part of a volume license scheme). Hmmm....
  6. Just curious, does anybody know why LabVIEW.exe is querying some Flexlm License Manager registry keys (which do not even exist on my PC) very regularly? See attached picture.
  7. Hi all, If I get time I would like to refactor "Get All VIs in Memory.." that and its parent VI to remove a lot of the duplicate operations and array manipulations. For now though an easy performance boost is to cache the VI Dependencies. I have used variant attributes as a quick and dirty cache, as shown. I get approx 50% speedup for large projects (> 2500 VIs). With a bit of thought I am sure it can also be applied to the other temporary arrays that are used in this VI. Comments? The VI attached is saved in 2013. Get All VIs in Memory Including statically-referenced Reentrant
  8. Today I learned you can pass an I32 into the To Upper Case prim. Did this totally by accident. Has anybody ever used this feature before?
  9. I always put File-->Exit on every application that has a menu-bar, however my personal preference (as others have also said) these days is to handle the Panel close event so I put in both. To me the only no-no is a big fat Exit button on the GUI.
  10. Have you tried running the executable on your PC but with the source directory renamed to something else? This can help diagnose if some VIs/classes etc are not being included in the exe but are on your disk so the built application works fine. Also try move the exe somewhere else (on your PC) as if the application has relative paths to source code VIs it should then fail.
  11. OK point taken. I think my uses of the JKI template are much more localised (maybe the word I am looking for is specialised, but even this does not really convey what I mean, perhaps what I just mean is "simple") so my private data in the shift register is a bit more cohesive. I do not have a cluster-saurus with myriad elements.
  12. So what do you do when you need to execute a reasonably complicated bit of code which requires various bits of "data" in this cluster (i.e. a portion of code that screams out to be made into a sub-VI, which in my opinion is virtually anything non-trivial)? Do you unbundle the specific elements and pass them into a sub VI? I know it may be frowned upon, but by having the cluster typedef'd I then just pass the whole thing into/out of a sub-VI. Of course you could pass in a non-typedef cluster but we know how that is going to end...
  13. It would be nice if the template could include a typedef for the main cluster on the shift register, I normally end up creating one.
  14. Just to chip in here, I recently had the same problem (2013 SP1). Bundling in a "variable" wire did not cause the class output "cluster" to be updated. Bundling in a constant (in this instance it was a string) did cause the "cluster" to be updated correctly. Probably entirely related, editing some code in this class would cause the IDE to hard-crash, so I figure I just managed to get my code in a state that was not consistent. I fixed my problem by deleting the VI that caused the crash and re-creating it from scratch. I think the inconsistency happened when I renamed a class VI to some
  15. I think this is actually possible in the IDE, but not in built applications.
  16. In LabVIEW (and perhaps all Web Services, I am not sure here) the connection string is in the form: host_address:port/WebServiceName/QueryString so it just seems to me that something is redundant here. You can infact have multiple Web Services on the same port when running in the IDE, but then I suppose there is only a single application (LabVIEW.exe) that is bound to the port. However as soon as you have built applications this paradigm breaks.
  17. Something to add (note, this is just something I "figured" out, it is completely uneducated and could be totally wrong) on the handle vs a pointer to a handle... Dealing with a pointer to a handle is a mechanism that allows the underlying memory allocation mechanism to do stuff like defrag or completely change your memory allocation without affecting your running application. Your application has a constant "memory address" that is the pointer to the handle. Then any actual requests to memory always go through the lower level manager (i.e. LabVIEW's memory manager) which actually does the
  18. Sure, your comments pretty much echo my internal dialogue. I can't figure out what the point is then of naming the web service? If all traffic to the IP address and port gets directed to the single instance of the web service why bother identifying it by name?
  19. Amazon EC2 is pretty cool.

    1. CRoebuck


      It is Neil, just be careful to keep an eye on your bill. I dropped off the free tier and it cost me a few £

  20. I was being a bit facetious, but I did not know about it only being TLS, so I forgive you. I have a ten week old at home, I didn't get to sleep with anybody last night
  21. Just tried out something that I would have expected should work, but doesn't. As a Web Service is identified by a name I would have expected I could run several of them on the same system with the same port. This does not work, whichever service is started first works, the other does not. Moving the second Web Service to a different port works properly. Am I being unreasonable with my expectations here? I know enough about ports to be dangerous but that is about all, is there some underlying restriction of the OS (Windows in this instance) that only allows one application to bind onto
  22. It's a good thing NI never got around to making an SSH toolkit
  23. So, most of you here are probably aware of the Heartbleed bug in OpenSSL. How seriously is everybody taking this? Seems like a good time to change my password; "12345" was probably due for an extra digit on the end by now ;-)
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.