Dan07 Posted September 13, 2012 Report Share Posted September 13, 2012 Hello, I have two reference clusters that are strict type def. and I need to merge them into one but keeping the Labels of the objects. This is just an example because I have a larger code with several objects and I need to merge references clusters into one, since many SubVIs have unbundle by name functions already setted. It is a long story. LOL I don't need to have it happening on run time, it can be done before allowing me to create one single reference cluster that I will feed to my unbundle functions into the SubVIs. Find below a picture showing what I want to achieve. Thanks. Dan07 Quote Link to comment
ShaunR Posted September 13, 2012 Report Share Posted September 13, 2012 Hello, I have two reference clusters that are strict type def. and I need to merge them into one but keeping the Labels of the objects. This is just an example because I have a larger code with several objects and I need to merge references clusters into one, since many SubVIs have unbundle by name functions already setted. It is a long story. LOL I don't need to have it happening on run time, it can be done before allowing me to create one single reference cluster that I will feed to my unbundle functions into the SubVIs. Find below a picture showing what I want to achieve. Thanks. Dan07 Don't build an array. Build a cluster. 2 Quote Link to comment
Dan07 Posted September 13, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 13, 2012 ShaunR Your solution is great! Is it possible to merge all References Cluster into one but when I unbundle it by name and select which element I want, don't have to select first the source cluster (in your example, Cluster 1 or Cluster 2) and then the reference that I want? Is it possible to bypass the selection of the Cluster name (Cluster 1 or Cluster 2) and have only the list of all objects in Cluster 1 and Cluster 2, everything together into one single list? Thanks. Dan07. Quote Link to comment
jcarmody Posted September 13, 2012 Report Share Posted September 13, 2012 You'd have to unbundle each of the smaller clusters before building the larger one. Quote Link to comment
Dan07 Posted September 14, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2012 jcarmody Thanks for the suggestion but the cluster is to big for that. it will take to much work to accomplish this task. However, I followed ShaunR (build a cluster instead of an array) and everything works great now. Thanks all. Dan07. Quote Link to comment
Wire Warrior Posted September 17, 2012 Report Share Posted September 17, 2012 Did I read that right ShaunR? If I right click on a name node it will let me hide the long names? That's awesome. Thanks I didn't know that. Quote Link to comment
hooovahh Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 Did I read that right ShaunR? If I right click on a name node it will let me hide the long names? That's awesome. Thanks I didn't know that. Yeah very useful for clusters of clusters of clusters...etc. I do my best to not have any items in my cluster have the same name as another item in another cluster. When hide long names is turned on, a quick glance may not be enough to ensure the right element was selected, if the same name is used. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.