PJM_labview

Same here.

Interesting method. You could get back to use Inkscape if we could convince NI to allow for 24 (or 32-bit) VI Icon... PJM

More improvement request: You should probably disable drag and drop tree item The navigation key (while navigating the tree) do not change the visible frame PJM

I have a couple of comments: I think that using system controls would look a lot better than 3D control --> When you create your custom menu you have: &gt; CaseSelector : My_Menu_Tag&lt; Instead use this (because the ">" and "<" are only needed if you have SubMenu(s))CaseSelector : My_Menu_Tag Additionally, it is recommend that you use some meaningful tag, so replace "My_Menu_Tag" by "Case_Selector_Tag" for example. Otherwise this look pretty good! PJM

Same here, I never saw that before. I think this *may* be related to my usage of the "convert stacked sequence to flat sequence structure" method (but I am really not sure). PJM

After running a bunch of scripting operation on a VI, I got the following error that required me to kill LV. Anybody knows what this is (I am just curious since I don't really expect stability while playing with scripting)? Note: This was in LabVIEW 8.21 PJM

Do I really need to (see below)? I actually don't mind it too much in regular VI, but I do not like it at all in state machine. PJM

I tried very hard to use Auto-Grow (I kept using it for over 2 years) and eventually I gave up. I eventually saw more draw backs in using it than advantages. So, I have to disagree too. PJM

I actually saw a an example somewhere (maybe on NI website ) from somebody that created a Tab control using a picture control (this was prior to NI having a native tab control). PJM

So would I.

Note: This is a cross post (NI- Forum). PJM

This is a bummer (in my opinion I am "loosing" a column of about 120 to 150 pixels of real estate space because of this). I will try to remember to ping you about it at NI week. PJM

In LabVIEW 8.6 I am unable to horizontally shrink the project explorer window below a certain point (~ 360 pixels). This used to be possible in previous LabVIEW version (ex LV 8.2). Is there a way to re-enable this (maybe an ini key)? PJM

I have no idea why you would want to do that but here it is: PJM

QUOTE (normandinf @ May 12 2009, 07:02 PM) I agree, the CBR is way too strict (no pun intended). I also prefer to use the run method, but I would even consider using other mechanism to pass the data to the plugin (than the set input value). The goal being to limit code change when the plugin interface changes. By the way, if you use CBR, just create a control with the right type (connector pane) on your plugin caller and you will be ok. Of course all your plugins must have the same connector pane in that situation. PJM

QUOTE (huotom @ May 9 2009, 12:42 AM) This is now part of LabVIEW 8.6 http://lavag.org/old_files/monthly_05_2009/post-121-1241890575.png' target="_blank"> PJM

QUOTE (jzoller @ May 6 2009, 02:18 PM) Ya, system VIs (not a flag but a property or method ). But again this is easy to work around this. PJM

QUOTE (neBulus @ May 1 2009, 06:49 AM) I have had a lot of questions about the profiler since LV 8.0. I believe something was changed somewhere so that it does no longer behave quite the same way that in previous LV version

Here is the file xShadowDanx was trying to post. Note: I did not open it up. Download File:post-121-1241023757.zip PJM

I agree with Jason, there is no harm in doing this. By the way I believe the TSVNcache restart itself automatically (at least for me it does) so I think you can drop the "start TSVNCache.exe". PJM

I am still at 1.5.2. In the past I noticed that the cache will go crazy on occasion (especially when you have a lot of code in a folder). I always keep an handy shortcut to a bat file that has the following "taskkill /f /im TSVNCache.exe". Note: I don't believe I used this recently (for sure not in the last 6 months if not longer).

QUOTE (crelf @ Apr 21 2009, 12:14 PM) Done. PJM

QUOTE (crelf @ Apr 21 2009, 11:27 AM) I think that would be a mirror... PJM

I still have mine with the original box (a bit battered though) and all the documentations that came with it. Additionally I have 2 extensions card in it (32 and 128k). If I were to sell it I seriously doubt I would make money. I bough it in France and it was very expensive at the time. Oh, and I also still have a C64 (sadly no longer functioning, although I believe the floppy drive is still working). PJM

QUOTE (neBulus @ Apr 14 2009, 10:45 AM) Make sure the "wait until completion" flag is false. http://lavag.org/old_files/monthly_04_2009/post-121-1239737022.png' target="_blank"> PJM