Jump to content

Jordan Kuehn

Members
  • Content Count

    580
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Jordan Kuehn last won the day on October 30 2020

Jordan Kuehn had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

78

About Jordan Kuehn

  • Rank
    The 500 club

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Chicago

LabVIEW Information

  • Version
    LabVIEW 2020
  • Since
    2009

Contact Methods

Recent Profile Visitors

3,575 profile views
  1. Yes. edit// my apologies. I’m realizing now that I was combining that excellent event with the CLA event in my mind. Perhaps it could happen again in parallel?
  2. Hmm. Well the stuff that made last year’s great was it was largely community driven with some NI involvement and almost no fluff or upward trending graphs without axis labels/scales...
  3. I miss the BBQ and being in Austin, but I really enjoyed the virtual event last year.
  4. Any word if Silverlight is being replaced in 2021? (sorry don't intend to thread hijack, but I don't know if I'll be able to participate in the Beta this year)
  5. That deployment time does seem excessive, at least for deploying the application. Running interactively is a mixed bag in my experience. I have a few cRIO AF applications of various sizes at the moment. One crashes LabVIEW when I attempt to launch it interactively, another similar one works just fine. I use the debug tools to acquire queues (in a conditional disable structure) for the main Actor Core that has a small debug UI included with it. When deploying are you able to see what libraries or code seems to take so long while watching the items scroll past? Is it code you have wri
  6. I've used the aforementioned three and currently use Git+SourceTree. I've not had the problems others have had in that other thread with Git (yet) and in general it's straightforward to commit and branch. Any merging I have to do is a manual process, but when working on a branch I typically am altering a subset of files that I wind up just choosing over the previous ones. The integration with Jira is nice since I like the kanban boards and tracking issues with commits. We don't use this to its full potential, but I think that's also a good thing since it keeps productivity in focus rather than
  7. Software Engineer - LabVIEW Full Time Professional Norman, OK, US This position will be responsible for maintenance and development of software that is core to our Freedom Series Completion System. The ideal candidate will have demonstrable software programming capability (specifically in LabVIEW), control systems experience, mechanical aptitude, ability to direct others, and an ability to operate in a fast-paced environment. This position can be located anywhere in the United States, but will require some travel to Oklahoma City at the beginnin
  8. I have spent a lot of time with the RTI DDS toolkit and it is good. I’m using MQTT for a lot of similar use cases. I believe we chatted some time ago about this a little. However, I don’t think this or the messenger library are feasible with the expansion chassis (9147 in my case) unless I were to implement the communication protocol in their FPGA. I would be happy to be wrong here though.
  9. Following. Mostly because it's very common that I'll kick off an RT build and want to move on to working on the Host application. Or the other way around. IMO the different projects shouldn't block each other during a build, but I'm sure there's some linking thing that they didn't want to solve so instead they lock the entire IDE.
  10. @Omar Mussa Thank you for this detailed analysis. I've found that my testing in 2021 on LV 2020 almost exactly replicates your results. I found some code on the darkside from @smithd that doesn't fix this issue, but I then repurposed into a check before the read that prevents the system from repeatedly attempting to reconnect and then time out. It's not ideal in my use case, but is better than blocking timeouts from a few dozen individual reads in my application that bring it to its knees. I've found that this will reconnect if the system and SVE is present
  11. I have a request from non-LV programmers who are using the JSON output I am providing them to provide the schema so that they can ensure they are accurately parsing the data structure. I have used a tool similar to this: https://www.liquid-technologies.com/online-json-to-schema-converter to generate it, but it is imprecise. I’d prefer to just give them the typedef file, but they have no idea what to do with that.
  12. I skimmed through the comments and I hope this wasn't addressed. If so, my apologies. Is there a way to limit the number of decimal places stored in a double numeric? Also, is there a way to generate a JSON schema based on a LabVIEW data structure? Thank you for this excellent toolkit.
  13. Sorry to resurrect this thread, but I am unable to get the RAD utility to work on my 9147 expansion chassis. Any tips for getting this to work? I've tried multiple 9147s on multiple computers and networks. (Now to hijack after resurrecting) I'd like to streamline the entire base software loading package, but I can deal with that if needed. The biggest benefit I've got here is the deployment of modules/channels/scales. I have located /var/local/natinst/deployfwk/config/variables.xml and it appears that this file (or perhaps all the files in this directory) contains the module deployment in
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.