Antoine Chalons

QUOTE (TobyD @ Mar 11 2009, 03:08 PM) Damn true... ask for screen shots then...

QUOTE (TobyD @ Mar 11 2009, 03:14 PM) Because when I tested it on my computer I disconnected the path constants and I wanted to know which file was loaded first. I would have made the dependence with an error wire instead if I could but the 'read spreadsheet file.vi' doesn't have any :thumbdown:

QUOTE (marscru @ Mar 11 2009, 01:55 PM) Hi If your text files really only have this : 1 1 1 . . . 4 5 7 7 5 8 . . . Then this will do the job http://lavag.org/old_files/monthly_03_2009/post-7452-1236777963.png' target="_blank"> Side note, if someone can tell me why the substract doesn't work on 2D array when they have the same dimension sizes

I now think of Vugie's tool VIpreVIEW, this would be much better than a screen shot ! But it's still doesn't help you alot...

QUOTE (Cat @ Mar 11 2009, 12:25 PM) Hi Cat I think you're out of luck.. The only thing you can do if you're interested by a piece of code posted on the forum is to ask someone to make and post a screen shot of it. Sorry...

[/url]

QUOTE (Aristos Queue @ Mar 7 2009, 04:23 PM) I don't think what I have in mind is that complicated... The project "knows" the file name of the files it contains and therefore can keep a view of all file which name contains a other string token. Just that for a start would be nice and very nice if a file could appear in many of these "view" - which I like to call "smart folder" as a reference to "smart folders" in OS X. Not sure I'm clear in my explanation... but implementing this to have "smart folder like" folders in the LabVIEW project window does sound too complicated to me, or am I missing something ?

QUOTE (BenD @ Mar 6 2009, 05:15 PM) hmmm.. I think the "Posts" tab in your controls just shows the posts from the last month or week, or maybe the current month. Something alike anyway, so if you haven't post recently it will be empty. to be honest, I also didn't find myself the trick to get the list of all my post. http://forums.lavag.org/user-s-post-list-t12035.html' target="_blank">Yair told me the trick

QUOTE (BenD @ Mar 6 2009, 03:49 PM) Hi, http://forums.lavag.org/Timer-with-Pause-via-Functional-Global-t13420.html' target="_blank">Here is your post. Maybe the moderation team move it from a section to another if they though it was necessary. When a post is moved from a section to another, the link to the post doesn't change though. More generaly, to find posts from a user (the user can be yourself) you can click on the user to see his profile them select "find user's post" from the "option" drop-down menu. Or even directly from the drop down menu on the user name, "find member's posts". Hope this helps

I saw many discussion about how to organise the VIs (and other type of file) in the lvproj window. Now we have the auto-populating folder, the snap-shot folder, the virtual folder and the dependencies (am I forgetting another something ?), everyone has his way of using these options. Until recently I was mostly using auto-populating folders in order to have the same hierarchy in my lvproj and in the windows explorer but I am now using more and more the virtual folders, they're cool but they're cool enough... What I'd like to have a "smart folder" for which I could define a set of conditions to meet for a file to appear in it. Conditions could be : - an extension, - a string token in the name of the VI, - a date range for the date of last modification, - a range of file size, - does VI has documentation, - who made the last modification, - etc... to be continued... Of course a file could appear in several "smart folders"... which is unfortunately not the case now for virtual folders. Mac users certainly use "smart folders" in Mac OS X.. well that what I'd like in the lvproj, anyone else's interested ?

QUOTE (Antoine Châlons @ Feb 27 2009, 10:05 AM) Uffff... I gave it a quick try and it turns out that it's not that simple... there are many cases to consider ; I still think it can be done but first we have to use the http://forums.lavag.org/Scripting-Toolszip-file87.html' target="_blank">Scripting Tools and it's quite a bit of work !

QUOTE (Bjarne Joergensen @ Mar 4 2009, 03:11 PM) Here is the link to make a http://digital.ni.com/applications/psc.nsf/default?openform' target="_blank">feature suggestion to NI

QUOTE (Bjarne Joergensen @ Mar 4 2009, 01:49 PM) Maybe http://thinkinging.com/2008/09/23/removing-svn-folders-from-a-working-copy-with-tortoisesvn/' rel='nofollow' target="_blank">this will help you Also read the comments at the bottom

QUOTE (Phillip Brooks @ Mar 4 2009, 01:29 PM) Oh.. Indeed.. sorry I thought it was a typo, but no.QUOTE (Phillip Brooks @ Mar 4 2009, 01:29 PM) The reason it doesn't work from LabVIEW is that it the system exec.vi will wait until ping completes; it doesn't complete until you press a key to end the ping.I think you will need to use the -n parameter in a loop or find a different implimentation of ping. Well, the SystemExec.vi has a input parameter "wait until completion? (T)" just set it to False and that should be fine.

QUOTE (n00bzor @ Mar 4 2009, 12:44 PM) Hi, What is this parameter : "-t" for the ping command ? Is it not a mistake ? As you can see here, there is no "-t" for ping command.. maybe you need -f, no ? Hope this helps

QUOTE (Cat @ Mar 3 2009, 04:08 PM) Hi, Well.. How big is you code ? I mean how many VIs more or less.. Have you identified which VI in your code is chewing up your memory ? It's hard to have an intelligent guess without seeing the code.. can you post it ?

It would be cool to be able to make an inspection and "save it as a template inspection". Say for example a *.vbait file type that works like a template in MS Word, Excel or even like a *.vit in LabVIEW. For people who do do alot of vision and have their well structured basic inspection it is a real pain not be able to define our own template and just double clic it from the OS, start editing the application specific part of the inspection and save straight away. That is really a functionality that would make us save a lot of time ! (submitted as feature request to NI)

QUOTE (jdunham @ Feb 27 2009, 09:36 AM) Yep I'm sure we can do it with private methods and properties but hey... we're not the LabVIEW team after all . what ?!? who whispered "lazy" ?!?

I would like to be able to right-click on a structure (loops, frames, case, etc...) and to 'shrink to content' and along with it an option (in Tools > options > block diagram) to set the number of pixels to leave blank around the content. Clusters already do that. There is an OpenG function to adapt the FP size to the indicators.

QUOTE (Tomi Maila @ Feb 26 2009, 12:16 PM) This is great ! All the best to you ! By the way how many people work at Agile 4 at the moment ?

QUOTE (amila @ Feb 26 2009, 12:52 AM) place the IMAQ Rake in a loop and use a shift register : http://lavag.org/old_files/monthly_02_2009/post-7452-1235668135.png' target="_blank"> hope this helps

QUOTE (neBulus @ Feb 26 2009, 05:44 PM) lol... the answer is in the question : both !

QUOTE (crelf @ Feb 26 2009, 05:23 PM) Indeed, it was private in LV 8.2 QUOTE (crelf @ Feb 26 2009, 05:23 PM) Try making a VI in 8.6 with it in there and save it as an 8.2 VI. Yes that will work. Another option is to enable scripting and private methods / properties in LV 8.2, see scripting forum.

QUOTE (Aristos Queue @ Feb 25 2009, 05:15 PM) I agree with that ! QUOTE (Aristos Queue @ Feb 25 2009, 05:15 PM) Yeah, it'd be a big change to the diagram to do it today. But if we didn't have 20 years of diagrams, wouldn't that be a better strategy? That is certainly a strong reason not to make the change... how did LV R&D people reacted to this idea ?

Hi Peter, QUOTE (pvanimpe @ Feb 12 2009, 12:45 PM) Do you need to have each of your variables in a separate graph ? Maybe you can group them all in the same graph. If you have "groups" of variables (pressures, temperatures, etc.), maybe you don't need to see all the graph at the same time.. You could have a drop-down menu to select which group you display. QUOTE (pvanimpe @ Feb 12 2009, 12:45 PM) also several XY graphs of variable a against b...) Is it fine if you have only one graph and one XY graph ? You could do something like this : Can you post your code or a screenshot of the part you'd like to modify ? That would make helping you easier. Hope this helps