Change Detection VI Macro (.vim)

[bbean 21]

After reading this LabVIEW Idea exchange request:

http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW-Idea-Exchange/Provide-a-better-way-to-implement-a-polymorphic-VI/idi-p/920487

 

I was inspired to create VI macro(s) to attempt to address the problem mentioned in the request.  Attached is my first attempt and I'm looking for feedback since I know people here have strong opinions.   The benefit of this method is that a single vim (or 2 could replace a polymorphic VI with over 48 separate VIs....unless I'm missing something.  I know that VI macros are not officially supported by NI, but that hasn't stopped us from using unsupported features before.  Some people have probably already done something like this, but I couldn't find an example.

 

To use the files, unzip them and copy them all to your \LabVIEW (version)\user.lib\macros\ directory.  

Create the directory if it does not exist.  For example: C:\Program Files (x86)\National Instruments\LabVIEW 2014\user.lib\macros\

 

And as described in the wait-ms-with pass through post below, modify your LabVIEW.ini file to have the following

    ExternalNodesEnabled=True

and Optionally

    XNodeWizardMode=True

 

http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW-Idea-Exchange/Wait-ms-with-error-pass-through/idc-p/3178218#M31820

 

Open the Example Changed.vi and review.

Changed Example.zip

[ShaunR 808]

Yup. Good example of where a VIM wipes the floor with the other solutions in terms of conciseness and ease of implementing..

[lordexod 13]

VI Macros (VIM) supports "XMacro.xnode".

[bbean 21]

VI Macros (VIM) supports "XMacro.xnode".

 

Are you suggesting one could copy/modify that Xnode to extend its capabilities to their liking?

[lordexod 13]

vim file works with any path, not only "user.lib\macros".

XMacro.xnode - is the engine of the vi macros.

[hooovahh 695]

VIMs in my mind are the express VI of type adaption.  If your use cases are completely within the capabilities of a DAQ Assistant function, then you are going to love how simple it is to use.  But if your needs don't fit those cases, then you need to write DAQ code using the DAQmx API.  Same here.  

 

If you want XNode like features like mouse clicking, double clicking, right clicking, running a VI when a new type is wired, etc, then you're going to have to do it in an XNode, not a VIM.  What we really need is some scripting code that generates XNodes, with the features of VIMs, then you have the simplicity of VIMs, with the flexibility of XNodes.  The fact that VIMs just call the code in <LV Install>\resource\GenericLabVIEW makes it look possible.

[hooovahh 695]

Okay a couple more things I learned.  The first is something already does happen when you change the type on your VIM, two VIs are ran, 

 

<LV Install>\resource\GenericLabVIEW\GenericLabVIEW_AdaptToInputs.vi

and optionally

<LV Install>\resource\GenericLabVIEW\GenericLabVIEW_GenerateCode.vi

 

If you look at some of the XNodes posted in the code repository they follow the same design.  Basically if you re-wire a normal XNode, then the adapt ability is ran.  Now if the data type of a terminal you cared about changed, you may need to go regenerate the code.  Just like our XNodes, this VIM works in a similar way and these two VIs are ran, with the second one being optional.

 

Next I also discovered something that basically breaks VIMs, but I think they are intended to allow for making some inputs adaptive, and some not.  Imagine you have a delete from array, like the OpenG ones.  It takes an array of something, and an array of indexes.  If you turn this into a VIM both inputs are adaptive, but that isn't what you really want, indexes should always be an array of I32.  Well if you put on your front panel of a VI a control named "Generic LabVIEW:Adapt To Type States", have the data type be a 2D array where columns 0 is control labels, and column 1 defines what that control should be.  I believe FT means fixed, and unspecified are adaptive (which is why all inputs are adaptive by default).  Of course when I go to use this it doesn't do some other things properly, like icon, and terminals aren't right so this isn't very useful yet, but I was just so excited I had to share, even if it doesn't do anything yet.  Of course even if you do get some inputs adaptive and some fixed, you still have the issue of limiting some inputs to say scalar, or say 1D array but no other size.  That again is where the flexibility of XNodes is needed at the moment.

[bbean 21]

 Well if you put on your front panel of a VI a control named "Generic LabVIEW:Adapt To Type States", have the data type be a 2D array where columns 0 is control labels, and column 1 defines what that control should be.  I believe FT means fixed, and unspecified are adaptive (which is why all inputs are adaptive by default).  Of course when I go to use this it doesn't do some other things properly, like icon, and terminals aren't right so this isn't very useful yet, but I was just so excited I had to share, even if it doesn't do anything yet.  Of course even if you do get some inputs adaptive and some fixed, you still have the issue of limiting some inputs to say scalar, or say 1D array but no other size.  That again is where the flexibility of XNodes is needed at the moment.

Interesting.  Good find.  If you look at the front panel enumerator for Terminal Behavior there is another option "Depends" and also a "dependency chain array" control and "index of dependency" control below it.  Any speculation as to what that option would be for.?

[ShaunR 808]

Okay a couple more things I learned.  The first is something already does happen when you change the type on your VIM, two VIs are ran, 

 

<LV Install>\resource\GenericLabVIEW\GenericLabVIEW_AdaptToInputs.vi

and optionally

<LV Install>\resource\GenericLabVIEW\GenericLabVIEW_GenerateCode.vi

 

If you look at some of the XNodes posted in the code repository they follow the same design.  Basically if you re-wire a normal XNode, then the adapt ability is ran.  Now if the data type of a terminal you cared about changed, you may need to go regenerate the code.  Just like our XNodes, this VIM works in a similar way and these two VIs are ran, with the second one being optional.

 

Next I also discovered something that basically breaks VIMs, but I think they are intended to allow for making some inputs adaptive, and some not.  Imagine you have a delete from array, like the OpenG ones.  It takes an array of something, and an array of indexes.  If you turn this into a VIM both inputs are adaptive, but that isn't what you really want, indexes should always be an array of I32.  Well if you put on your front panel of a VI a control named "Generic LabVIEW:Adapt To Type States", have the data type be a 2D array where columns 0 is control labels, and column 1 defines what that control should be.  I believe FT means fixed, and unspecified are adaptive (which is why all inputs are adaptive by default).  Of course when I go to use this it doesn't do some other things properly, like icon, and terminals aren't right so this isn't very useful yet, but I was just so excited I had to share, even if it doesn't do anything yet.  Of course even if you do get some inputs adaptive and some fixed, you still have the issue of limiting some inputs to say scalar, or say 1D array but no other size.  That again is where the flexibility of XNodes is needed at the moment.

 

I don't see why all VI terminals can't have an option to adapt to type. We have them for CLFN which is very useful. It'd be great if it was just a checkmark on the compane like the "Required" or "Dynamic Dispatch". Then it would be easy to fix the type of controls/inidcators and mix-n-match adaptive and static types and we wouldn't even need a special type of VI/Xnode.

[hooovahh 695]

Any speculation as to what that option would be for.?

It's hard to say, I honestly think this functionality just isn't complete, or if it is I'm missing some key component.  The Dependency Chain is suppose to be be provided in the same way that a terminal is told to be adaptive or not, using that control on the front panel.  Look at the NamesInFullyQualifiedName.vi, it generates the Dependency Chain.  If you put in something like "a.b" you get two elements in the output "a", and "b", if you put in something like "[1a.b] you get two items, first has an index of 1, which is specified, and the second is "b]".  I think this is some kind of way of specifying specific data types that a terminal can be, not just "Adaptive" changing to anything, or "Fixed" not changing, but instead changing to specific types.

 

Personally if I were to implement something like this (and I've thought about it) I would specify the types that a terminal could be differently.  Maybe provide a set of options in a wizard stating which controls can be what, and then that information could be saved as tags on that control, or maybe in a subfolder where control references could be which applied to that control.  Having it be another control on the FP named a specific way, with data in it a specific way seems clunky, especially if that control isn't hidden.  But even if it is as a developer I'd wonder why this random control is there which doesn't do anything.  I think VI Analyzer would probably flag that as unused code that could be deleted.

 

I don't see why all VI terminals can't have an option to adapt to type. We have them for CLFN which is very useful. It'd be great if it was just a checkmark on the compane like the "Required" or "Dynamic Dispatch". Then it would be easy to fix the type of controls/inidcators and mix-n-match adaptive and static types and we wouldn't even need a special type of VI/Xnode.

Oh don't get me wrong I think every terminal should have the option to be adaptive.  But under some circumstances the developer of the function might want inputs to have a limited number of data types that they support.  Like in the example I gave if I have a Delete From Array, and I provide a 1D array of Doubles, and I want to delete and index, but the index I specify is a string data type with the value of "blah" what should my function do?  It is clear that an index input should not adapt to any data type, but only a limited number.  Even the array input should be limited to only 1D arrays of anything, not scalars or multi dimensional arrays, unless the function can handle those types.

 

Having it be a right click option on a connector pane seems like a perfect fit.  Imagine if you right click and choose adaptive, and then are given a dialog where you specify what types it should adapt to.  Any data type?  Any 1D array?  Any cluster? Any Numeric of N dimensions?  Then in your code for that VI you could read what the type is, and do specific things if needed.  I honestly think we could make something like this today, just given enough time.

 

BTW sorry for hijacking your thread.

[bbean 21]

 Then in your code for that VI you could read what the type is, and do specific things if needed.  I honestly think we could make something like this today, just given enough time.

 

In the spirit of dreaming, I think what would also add to this idea would be a new LabVIEW primitive called TypeDetectDisableCase Structure that would work like a case selector for datatypes, but would automagically (like an Xnode) disable the irrelevant case and enable the relevant type case for the inputs.  I think having all the code in one VI (even for different types) is key so you don't end up with a Xnode solution that circles back to the polymorphic situation where you have a bunch of template subVIs to manage.

[hooovahh 695]

I think having all the code in one VI (even for different types) is key so you don't end up with a Xnode solution that circles back to the polymorphic situation where you have a bunch of template subVIs to manage.

Well NI sorta tried that and it was called External Nodes and it wasn't flexible enough.  And to be fair you don't need N templates of subVIs to manage the different permutations, it is just the most straight forward way.  I've had an XNode where there are multiple disabled diagram cases, and one case will get enabled based on the options selected.  If you code in the smartness then you don't necessarily end up with multiple templates.  Heck you don't have to even have one template you can write the VI from scratch, but again that isn't the most straight forward solution, so it seldom is used.

 

I guess one down side I see from accepting multiple data types, then having one template VI read the data type, and then act differently based on it, is that then there is this extra overhead that wouldn't have been needed.  I mean the XNode (and VIM) can know the data type it is being used on, and again if the logic is made, you don't need to do things like read the data type and act one way or another, it's just simpler this way.

[lordexod 13]

Instead replace vi to vim.

Macroizer.llb copy to "..\resource\plugins\PopupMenus\edit time panel and diagram" and right-click on subvi and "Convert To Macro". 

[bbean 21]

Instead replace vi to vim.

Macroizer.llb copy to "..\resource\plugins\PopupMenus\edit time panel and diagram" and right-click on subvi and "Convert To Macro". 

Been waiting for an excuse to install 2015