Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 months later...
Posted
  On 7/9/2020 at 4:39 AM, Porter said:

Bug? JSONText doesn't apply input default values to missing cluster items of array elements.

image.png.cfac8c824a0c9d7cb52ca3a937cbf166.pngimage.png.8ae1b813f1c246373cf99f02b3bc8356.png

I was hoping to see "Default", 1 and "2", NaN but instead get "",1 and "2",0

I think that it is due to the behavior of the Get Array Information VI.

The workaround is to convert the array elements individually as clusters:

image.png.30316820d66dc9e23dc0c3ae7f3760c8.pngimage.png.4022f34cc2d9604696e4e09bf7fe0789.png

Expand  

Note: you can also do this (using the JSONpath for all array elements) because here one is specifying the element of the array (with default) rather that an empty array:

254981577_2020-09-2315_44_57-Untitled1BlockDiagramonJSONtext.lvproj_MyComputer_.png.1c8917c4a3694ddfabfb593626f8e9f3.png

  • Thanks 1
  • 5 weeks later...
Posted

I've been using this toolkit when passing data to a WebVI in LabVIEW NXG 5.0.0. It appears that the JSON parser built into NXG WebVIs is incapable of reading enums or timestamps. I am not certain if that is a limitation of the parser or the encoder. Are you able to shed any light on this drjdpowell?

Posted
  On 10/29/2020 at 3:25 PM, Jordan Kuehn said:

It appears that the JSON parser built into NXG WebVIs is incapable of reading enums or timestamps. I am not certain if that is a limitation of the parser or the encoder.

Expand  

The "Flatten to JSON" and "Unflatten from JSON" nodes in NXG WebVIs are essentially the same as the ones built into classic LabVIEW. Both are incapable of processing enums or timestamps.

As a workaround, you can create a "bridging" typedef (GType) which replaces enums and timestamps with strings. Use that with the NXG JSON parser, and then convert it to your "real" GType.

Posted
  On 10/29/2020 at 7:44 PM, JKSH said:

The "Flatten to JSON" and "Unflatten from JSON" nodes in NXG WebVIs are essentially the same as the ones built into classic LabVIEW. Both are incapable of processing enums or timestamps.

As a workaround, you can create a "bridging" typedef (GType) which replaces enums and timestamps with strings. Use that with the NXG JSON parser, and then convert it to your "real" GType.

Expand  

Thank you for the confirmation. I have done something similar using numeric types, but it is inconvenient at best. An NXG version of this toolkit would be fantastic. 

Posted
  On 10/29/2020 at 8:03 PM, Jordan Kuehn said:

Thank you for the confirmation. I have done something similar using numeric types, but it is inconvenient at best. An NXG version of this toolkit would be fantastic. 

Expand  

Unfortunately, the NXG Web module lacks both recursion and VIs for determining the data type inside a variant.  This makes porting JSONtext to it very difficult.

Posted
  On 10/29/2020 at 9:40 PM, drjdpowell said:

Unfortunately, the NXG Web module lacks both recursion and VIs for determining the data type inside a variant.  This makes porting JSONtext to it very difficult.

Expand  

I'm not surprised by this, but thank you for weighing in. Maybe when NXG reaches CG parity in 2050.

  • Haha 1
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
Posted

I skimmed through the comments and I hope this wasn't addressed. If so, my apologies.

Is there a way to limit the number of decimal places stored in a double numeric?

 

Also, is there a way to generate a JSON schema based on a LabVIEW data structure?

 

Thank you for this excellent toolkit.

Posted
  On 1/28/2021 at 1:53 AM, Jordan Kuehn said:

Is there a way to limit the number of decimal places stored in a double numeric?

Expand  

No.  Only by custom formatting the numbers into JSON yourself.  I often use single numerics, as 7 decimal places is more reasonable looking.  

Posted
  On 1/28/2021 at 8:34 AM, drjdpowell said:

Not sure I understand the question.  Can you rephrase it?

Expand  

I have a request from non-LV programmers who are using the JSON output I am providing them to provide the schema so that they can ensure they are accurately parsing the data structure. I have used a tool similar to this: https://www.liquid-technologies.com/online-json-to-schema-converter to generate it, but it is imprecise. I’d prefer to just give them the typedef file, but they have no idea what to do with that. 

Posted
  On 1/28/2021 at 8:50 AM, Jordan Kuehn said:

I have a request from non-LV programmers who are using the JSON output I am providing them to provide the schema so that they can ensure they are accurately parsing the data structure. I have used a tool similar to this: https://www.liquid-technologies.com/online-json-to-schema-converter to generate it, but it is imprecise. I’d prefer to just give them the typedef file, but they have no idea what to do with that. 

Expand  

Ah, you mean this then: http://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/, and you want a function that converts a LabVIEW Cluster/Array to a basic JSON Scheme.  

That does not exist in JSONtext but could at some point.  

 

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 2/4/2021 at 7:17 AM, TiborK said:

Hi, is there a chance to release build version for LabVIEW 2015?
In VIPM is allowed just >=2017.

Expand  

I'm afraid it uses Malleable VIs that were introduced in 2017, meaning it can't, as a whole at least, be back ported.

Posted (edited)

Would it be possible to add support for maps / sets - as if they were arrays - ?

I can really remember if they were added in LV 17 or 18 or 19....

Edited by Antoine Chalons
Posted
  On 2/4/2021 at 10:52 AM, Antoine Chalons said:

Would it be possible to add support for maps / sets - as if they were arrays - ?

I can really remember if they were added in LV 17 or 18 or 19....

Expand  

Sets and Maps were added in 2019.  But just to throw a wrench into your dreams, you can get some interesting combinations when it comes to sets and maps.  You could have a set of maps.  You could have a map with a set for a key.  I'm just saying, you would have to plan this out very carefully.

Posted
  On 2/4/2021 at 12:27 PM, crossrulz said:

Sets and Maps were added in 2019.  But just to throw a wrench into your dreams, you can get some interesting combinations when it comes to sets and maps.  You could have a set of maps.  You could have a map with a set for a key.  I'm just saying, you would have to plan this out very carefully.

Expand  

Very true!!

I do use nested combinations of set and map - not hugely deep but it does turn out to be very useful.

And yes it might not be trivial to handle ALL possible cases.

But let's engineer ambitiously, no?

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Is there any way to simply get the keys or have the json structure convert into a cluster?  I've tried using the "find multiple items.vi", but nothing shows.  No errors either.

83424669_2021-03-1712_00_42-jsonparser.viFrontPanel1_.png.84c6e6c19c8658d0196044f4cf13faf5.png

 

I've also tried using "Get all objects items.vi" but looks like I have to guess at the offset and do a recursive loop.

204629551_2021-03-1712_05_26-jsonparser.viFrontPanel2_.png.82f67d56f64379b5dfcabfab90d3fb4d.png

Thank you,

Ron

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.