
AnalogKid2DigitalMan
Members-
Posts
275 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by AnalogKid2DigitalMan
-
QUOTE(xtaldaz @ May 23 2007, 01:26 PM) Yeah. Sheriff Joe will lock you up in tent city. And were getting back into the 100's in Phoenix. Not a pretty sight.
-
From The Salt Lick's home page: You've found "The Salt Lick" so named by owner Hisako Roberts and her husband, the late Thurman Roberts, because "a Salt Lick is something where all the animals congregate. There is something good, something essential about it." Since alpha has deemed that 97.73% of us are at animal level, I think the place is going to be packed. Sounds like a good time!
-
Here's the page I was looking for: http://teslamania.delete.org/frames/frameindex.html Click on the Big Arcs and Sparks link That arc in the Nevada substation was 100 feet in length! Look down to the 3rd or 4th topic on that Arc/Spark page for a description of that test. There's also some cool videos regarding high power tests and disasters, click on the images to play the videos.
-
I have driven by that substation many times on the way in/out of Las Vegas. Pretty big facility, it is part of the Hoover Dam grid. Here is an explanation of Basic Electricity:
-
Maybe the topic of this thread should be changed to CRELFarray. Or something to do with clones and re-entrant vi's
-
Crelf- You let the smoke out. You know electronics won't work any more after you let the smoke out.
-
It can be a bear, your are not the only one- battery power does seem to work as thomas2609 pointed out (see Mark's post in 2nd page of this thread). It seems like the front end of the 600x's input is the culprit. http://forums.ni.com/ni/board/message?boar...ding&page=1
-
QUOTE(Nullllll @ Mar 23 2007, 01:19 PM) Have you tried sending it a Nullllll String?? Please post what you have so far. You remind me of someone(s) else. Yen- Nice site you linked
-
Monitor the battery power
AnalogKid2DigitalMan replied to Thang Nguyen's topic in Calling External Code
QUOTE(dthomson @ Mar 22 2007, 12:42 PM) Good point Dave. I took low power to mean low current requirements on the load, not that it was power limited. Power consumption is the crirtcal issue- taken from a battery, I figured his system had other power sources to power it. Not too many details to go on. -
Why use LabVIEW when here's an optimal solution for under $200 USD, sure you can get extra credit for thinking outside the box. http://www.omega.com/iseries/i32/i32.htm
-
Monitor the battery power
AnalogKid2DigitalMan replied to Thang Nguyen's topic in Calling External Code
QUOTE(Thang Nguyen @ Mar 20 2007, 08:20 AM) Thang: The good ol 7805 is a robust 5V regulator. Heres a link for a sample circuit. http://www.eidusa.com/Electronics_Voltage_Regulator.htm''>http://www.eidusa.com/Electronics_Voltage_Regulator.htm' target="_blank">http://www.eidusa.com/Electronics_Voltage_Regulator.htm -
Todays feature on APOD- The 5th dimension! Get your red/blue glasses out! http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070318.html
-
VIPM - Package Enhancement ?!
AnalogKid2DigitalMan replied to LAVA 1.0 Content's topic in LAVA Lounge
Does the package need a 'wrapper'? Or will it natively spawn? -
Test FFT Speed, LV7.1 vs. LV8.20
AnalogKid2DigitalMan replied to Gary Rubin's topic in LabVIEW General
Gary: I ran your original vi on my older Dell Precision 370 2.8GHz single core (circa 8-2004), 512M RAM (185M free) LV8.2 Win XP SP2. 81-82msec consistently (FASTER) The original test I ran was on a Precision 380 circa 5-2005 I do not know RAM specifics, but using AIDA32 I did memory Read/Write tests. Pecision 370: Read 5274MB/sec, Write 2081MB/sec Precision 380: Read 5578MB/sec, Write 2152 MB/sec. Do not know why the slower 370 memory executes faster. -
Test FFT Speed, LV7.1 vs. LV8.20
AnalogKid2DigitalMan replied to Gary Rubin's topic in LabVIEW General
LV 8.2 1st run 166, 2nd run 106, 3rd through 5th runs 96-97. LV freshly opened with your code Running P4 Duo Core 2.8GHz, 1G RAM (500M free), Win XP Pro SP2. It was odd that the first run was so slow, 2nd run was faster, subsequent runs faitly repeatable. Maybe an initial memory allocation? Sorry, only 8.2 available to me. -
Gotta love the ads. Crelf- you got a bunch of alcohol related ones under your post. What you puttin' in that tea boy? The 5th dimension goes on, almost to 10 pages. It absorbs everything.
-
Presuming you are running under a Windows OS, such timing cannot be achieved in software. There is just too much overhead from the OS, in addition when another process takes prioirity over your vi, timing will become slower and unpredictable. You could look at timed loops though, but performance may not be up to your requirements. You need a hardware solution- a DAQ card with counters/timers to get short duration and accurate pulse trains with adjustable duty cycles. Or possibly LabVIEW RealTime (RT). Another alternative, since you are attempting motion control is to get a dedicated motion control card.
-
Current versus Voltage yields Resistance. Resistance to learning?
-
From block diagram, select Dialog & User Interface Functions, then Prompt User for Input function (an Express vi) alnaimi: May I suggest as part of your LV learning, take the time to go through every function pallate available to you and browse through each of them to see what canned functions are available. Not that you should build a vi around them to test and try each one, but rather let what is available to sink into your mind. Then when you have a task to accomplish, draw on your memory to say- ah, yes, I remember seeing a Max and Min function for an array- that could be of use for what I have to do.
-
Create an executable?
-
Contact Keithley Tech support?