Leaderboard

So a couple of years ago I was reading about the ZLIB documentation on compression and how it works. It was an interesting blog post going into how it works, and what compression algorithms like zip really do. This is using the LZ77 and Huffman Tables. It was very education and I thought it might be fun to try to write some of it in G. The deflate function in ZLIB is very well understood from an external code call and so the only real ever so slight place that it made sense in my head was to use it on LabVIEW RT. The wonderful OpenG Zip package has support for Linux RT in version 4.2.0b1 as posted here. For now this is the version I will be sticking with because of the RT support. Still I went on my little journey trying to make my own in pure LabVIEW to see what I could do. My first attempt failed immensely and I did not have the knowledge, to understand what was wrong, or how to debug it. As a test of AI progression I decided to dig up this old code and start asking AI about what I could do to improve my code, and to finally have it working properly. Well over the holiday break Google Gemini delivered. It was very helpful for the first 90% or so. It was great having a dialog with back and forth asking about edge cases, and how things are handled. It gave examples and knew what the next steps were. Admittedly it is a somewhat academic problem, and so maybe that's why the AI did so well. And I did still reference some of the other content online. The last 10% were a bit of a pain. The AI hallucinated several times giving wrong information, or analyzed my byte streams incorrectly. But this did help me understand it even more since I had to debug it. So attached is my first go at it in 2022 Q3. It requires some packages from VIPM.IO. Image Manipulation, for making some debug tree drawings which is actually disabled at the moment. And the new version of my Array package 3.1.3.23. So how is performance? Well I only have the deflate function, and it only is on the dynamic table, which only gets called if there is some amount of data around 1K and larger. I tested it with random stuff with lots of repetition and my 700k string took about 100ms to process while the OpenG method took about 2ms. Compression was similar but OpenG was about 5% smaller too. It was a lot of fun, I learned a lot, and will probably apply things I learned, but realistically I will stick with the OpenG for real work. If there are improvements to make, the largest time sink is in detecting the patterns. It is a 32k sliding window and I'm unsure of what techniques can be used to make it faster. ZLIB G Compression.zip

Phew that is a pretty strong opinion! Although I personally am not a fan of the overall style of DQMH none of my problems are with the scripting/wizards or placeholder text. I think any framework that tries to do "a lot" will be complicated... your own personal framework (which you likely find trivial to use) is likely to be a bit weird to others. DQMH is extremely popular for a reason... To paraphrase the words of a wiser person than I, "please don't yuck someone elses yum"

Many years ago I made a demo for myself on how to drag and drop clones of a graph. I wanted to show a transparent picture of the new graph window as soon as the drag started, to give the user immediate feedback of what the drag does and the window to be placed exactly where it is wanted. I think I found inspiration for that on ni.com or here back then, but now I cannot find my old demo, nor the examples that inspired me back then. Now I have an application where I want to spawn trends of a tag if you drag the tag out of listbox and I had to remake the code...(see video below). At first I tried to use mouse events to position the window, but I was unable to get a smooth movement that way. I searched the web for similar solutions and found one that used the Input device API to read mouse positions to move a window without a title and that seemed to be much smoother. The first demo I made for myself is attached here (run the demo and drag from the list...). It lacks a way to cancel the drag though; Once you start the drag you have a clone no matter what. dragtrends.mp4 Has anyone else made a similar feature? Perhaps where cancelling is handled too, and/or with a more generic design / framework? Drag window out of listbox - Saved in LV2018.zip

Look at this new download on VIPM https://www.vipm.io/package/bjm_lib_request_power/

You want an ability to override the Equality or Comparison operators? I'm unsure, whether it really existed in OpenG packages, but now you have those neat malleable VIs, that let you do that: Search Unsorted 1D Array , Sort 1D Array , Search Sorted 1D Array. They have an additional input to specify your own equals or less function in a form of a custom comparison class or a VI refnum. There's an article to help: Creating a Custom Sorting Function in LabVIEW

This is exactly what was said in that ancient thread: Tree control in labview. So if you add 65536*N to the Item Symbols property of the Listbox and have the "Enable Indentation" option activated, you shift the symbol/glyph and the text N levels to the right. Could be useful for simple 'parent-child' relationships, if you don't want to use a Tree. And still it's used in Find Examples / NI Example Finder window:

I once went for an interview where they gave me a coding test and asked me to modify it. It was a very long time ago so I don't remember the exact modification they wanted (nothing to do with memory leaks) but I do remember the obtain queue and read queue inside a while loop with the release queue outside. I asked if they wanted me to also fix the memory leak as well as the modifications and they were a little puzzled until I explained what you have just said. I must have seen (and fixed) this while-loop bug-pattern a thousand times since then in various code bases. I also created this VI which I generally use instead of the primitives as it intialises on first call, can be called from anywhere, and prevents most foot-shooting by rolling them all into a single VI and ensuring all references but 1 are closed after use. Queue.vi

Those aren't typo's and errors. They are tests to see if we are paying attention.

In the past I have used the IMAQ drivers for getting the image, which on its own does not require any additional runtime license. It is one of those lesser known secrets that acquiring and saving the image is free, but any of the useful tools have a development, and deployment license associated with it. I've also had mild success with leveraging VLC. Here is the library I used in the past, and here is another one I haven't used but looks promising. With these you can have a live stream of a camera as long as VLC can talk to it, and then pretty easily save snapshots. EDIT: The NI software for getting images through IMAQ for free is called "NI Vision Common Resources". This LAVA thread is where I first learned about it.

Just to share how I got around this: By deleting 1 front panel item at a time I found that one single control was causing PaneRelief to crash; an XY graph. Setting it temporarily to not scale and replacing it with a standard XY graph (the one I had had some colours set to transparent etc) was enough to avoid having PaneRelief crash LabVIEW, but it would now just present a timeout error: I found a way arund this too though: the VI in question was member of a DQMH lvlib that probably added a lot of complexity for PaneRelief. With a copy saved as a non-member it worked: I could replace the graph, edit the splitters with PaneRelief without the timeout error (even setting the size to 0), then copy back the original graph replacing the temporary one, and finally move the copy back into the lvlib and swap it with the original. Voila! What a Relief... 😉 I probably have to repeat this whole ordeal if I ever need to readjust the splitters in that VI with PaneRelief though 😮

I confirm that this license is nearly identical to the standard EULA we use for our commercial products. Some wording is not applicable to a distributed palette of VIs like this. Our intention was to share a few reusable tools, used internally, with the community. Ideally, we should have released them under a standard open-source license such as MIT or a similar option. These VIs have been released “as-is,” without support or any guarantee that they will function for your specific use case. You may need to troubleshoot or fix any issues on your own. Feel free to use them in any context. I’ll look into whether it's possible to update the packages on the tool network to replace the current license with a more standard open-source one.

I put a temporary ban on inserting external links in posts (except from a safe list). We'll see what affect it has.

This is the modern 2020's equivalent of "works for me".

Your reporting of spam is helpful. And just like you are doing one report per user is enough since I ban the user and all their posts are deleted. If spam gets too frequent I notify Michael and he tweaks dials behind the scene to try to help. This might be by looking at and temporarily banning new accounts from IP blocks, countries, or banning key words in posts. He also will upgrade the forum's platform tools occasionally and it gets better at detecting and rejecting spam.

Apparently they moved it under Visible Items Edit: This also affects other types of structures.

Well, there are two aspects. The first is the technical one from hackers diving into the software and unhiding things that NI felt were not ready for prime time, to complicated for simple users, or possibly also to powerful. The main reason definitely always is however: if we release that, we have to spend a lot more effort to make it a finished feature (a feature for internal use where you can tell your users: "sorry that was not meant to be used in the way you just tried") is maybe 10 - 20% of development time than the finished feature for public use. There is also support required. That costs money in terms of substantial extra development, end user quality documentation (a simple notepad file doesn't cut it), maintenance and fixing things if something does not match the documented behaviour. And yes I'm aware they don't always fix bugs immediately (or ever) but the premise is, that releasing a feature causes a lot of additional costs and obligations, if you want to or not. The other aspect is, if someone who is an active partner and has active contacts with various people at NI, he is infinitely more likely to be able to influence decisions at NI than the greatest hacker doing his thing in his attic and never talking with anyone from NI. In that sense it is very likely that Jim having talked with a few people at NI has done a lot more to make NI release this feature eventually, than 20 hackers throwing every single "secret" about this feature on the street. In that sense the term "forcing NI's hands" is maybe a bit inaccurate. He didn't force them, but led them to see the light! Not out of pure selfless love, but to be able to officially use that feature for himself. The according Right-Click framework was a proof of concept to see how this feature can be used and mainly an example to other users how it can be used, and indeed once it worked it had fulfilled its purpose. That it was not maintained afterwards is not specifically JKI's fault. It is open source, so anyone could have picked up the baton, if they felt it was so valuable for them. The problem with many libraries is actually, if they are not open source and free, many complain about that, if it is open source and/or free, they still expect full support for it! In that sense I have seen a nice little remark recently:

Well, you are missing some important details in "The story of how this came about". So maybe indeed "it is worth a post of its own". It was LabVIEW 7.0 where they forgot to put a password on one of the VIs shipped with LabVIEW. And that VI had some node(s) on its block diagram including, I think, the BD reference property for the VI class. The community indeed got excited. But what did NI do? They tried to hide everything again in LabVIEW 7.1! I made a joke then that "our mother" NI must had had a PMS so she put the most interesting toys on a top shelf. So I made a"ladder" for us, kids, to get to them again and called it hviewlabs was me then, because that was a name of my company I used to sell my LabHSM Toolkit, an actor framework with actors controlled by hierarchical state machines (statecharts), long before the Statechart toolkit by NI, "THE Actor Framework", DQMH, and even before LVOOP. After PJM_Labview has published his private class generator http://forums.lavag.org/index.php?showtopic=307&hl=# and class hierarchies http://forums.lavag.org/index.php?showtopic=2161# and http://forums.lavag.org/index.php?showtopic=314&hl=hierarchy# (neither topic is available anymore) it became clear how to get access to private classes, properties and methods. However, it wasn't convenient enough. My PMS Assistant made it really easy. It gave back the access to those features to a much wider community of LabVIEW enthusiasts As you can see from the PMS topic discussion, by that time brian175 already had made his DataAct Class Browser. And he got really excited about the possibility not only browse but also to actually create objects, property and method nodes with the properties and method NI didn't want the users to see. By April of the same 2006 he figured out object creation too and incorporated the capabilities of PMS Assistant into DataAct Class Browser. At that point, I guess, NI decided that "the cat is out of the bag" and there is no point to resist. Nevertheless even after VI Scripting was made released by NI some classes, and even some properties and methods of public classes remain hidden even in LabVIEW 2024. I wonder why DataAct Class Browser is no longer available (as of January 2025) as well as original findings by PJM_Labview even here, on LavaG. Did NI "politely asked" admins to remove all that and just forgot about my PMS Assistant?

yes

There is an example shipped with LabVIEW called "Image Compression with DCT". If one added the colour-space conversion, quantization and changed the order of encoding (entropy encoding) and Huffman RLE you'd have a JPG [En/De]coder. That'd work on all platforms Not volunteering; just saying

The thing I loved about the original LabVIEW was that it was not namespaced or partitioned. You could run an executable and share variables without having to use things like memory maps. I used to to have a toolbox of executables (DVM, Power Supplies, oscilloscopes, logging etc. ) and each test system was just launching the appropriate executable[s] at the appropriate times. It was like OOP composition for an entire test system but with executable modules. Additionally, crashes were unheard of. In the 1990's I think I had 1 insane object in 18 months and didn't know what a GPF fault was until I started looking at other languages. We could run out of memory if we weren't careful though (remember the Bulldozer?). Progress!

I don't do Discord. I don't even do Ni.com. Feedback isn't really necessary. I only knocked it up because I went down a rabbit hole and wasn't impressed with the existing LabVIEW solutions. I thought I'd throw it in here to see if someone could improve it. My solution is optimised but there may have been a better alternative solution or maybe someone had a nice JPEG one (LSB doesn't survive JPEG compression). You might get a mention in the readme just for responding

You might have more success posting this on the Discord. Most of the conversations happen there these days.

My problem was on a windows machine but I managed to solve it; I found that using LVCompare also segfaulted on the same file, but did not segfault with the -nofp command line option. With this I was able to confirm the specific file that both LVMerge and LVCompare were segfaulting on, and systematically delete half the code and re-test whether LVCompare would crash. After a few hours I was able to track down the offending piece of code to a random chart; I'm honestly still not sure what was causing them to segfault, but deleting and replacing the chart fixed the issue. Hope this helps someone else out there!

This toolkit offer you an efficient, stable, and reliable front panel control value refresh function. User can design their UI dashboard without any code development. 1. Powerful parallel execution capability, Support clone reentrant execution running mode, you can create multi dashboard UIs at the same time and controls can synchronous refresh across different UI. 2. High-speed data refresh capability, even with thousands of controls on a single UI, can easily maintain a refresh rate of 50ms while consuming very little CPU resources. 3. Support all control data types that "Tag Engine" support, this mean the only thing you need to do is to change the control "Label" with "Tag name", then the control will refresh automatically. 4. Support "muParser Expression", you can type the control "Label" with "Expression" that muParser Expression support, For example "a + b" "a > 1 & b >= 2".

Hi My advice for managing multiple versions of LabVIEW is always the same : >>> Install only one LabVIEW version per partition if you also need to install any driver, toolkit or module. Or need other software that integrates with LabVIEW in some way. No exceptions. I do have VMWare installed with Windows XP to be able to open ancient LabVIEW versions like 6.1 or read the old CHM help files, accepting the sluggish performance of the VM environment. I avoid using it for anything 'serious'. To manage the span between LabVIEW 2018 and 2024 I would divide the disk into two partitions and install two copies of Windows and then install LabVIEW. To manage multiple partitions and selecting which to boot from by default, I recommend installing EasyBCD. But you don't have to. Windows creates a simple multiboot menu itself. There are other options too. But they require some dedication going into the art of multiboot management. ¤ You can install Windows on an external USB3 connected disk, SSD or FlashDisk. Microsoft abandoned the concept in 2020. But a program called Rufus revived the concept and now there are many tools that gives this as an opportunity. Works splendidly even with Windows 11. ¤ Some laptops ( and desktops of course ) support easy change of the disk. Sometimes using a replaceable disk craddle instead of the DVD drive. Good luck

Redis is certainly high performance and suited to multiple, loose writers, readers and subscribers, with bindings for so many ecosystems. One of its several features, which I haven't perused, are Streams. I'd be curious too to know whether continuous cross-app data streaming could be efficiently implemented using them.

Yup. There is: MMAP (1.0.1).

Discussion forums like LAVA and ni.com are challenged these days by LLMs that can answer in a well structured manner very quickly and handle follow-up questions on the spot. Forums have their stenghts, but when it comes to basic questions that LLMs can find a lot about, spread across multiple forums, the LLMs win. It is a bit of a catch 22 though, as the LLMs need the forums alive to stay up to date 😮 ------------------------------ Here is Grok answering you question of what a DVR is: DVRs as References: In LabVIEW, DVRs (Data Value References) are a mechanism to access data by reference rather than by value. This means that instead of creating copies of the data (as is typical in LabVIEW's dataflow paradigm), a DVR provides a pointer-like reference to a single memory location where the data resides. This avoids unnecessary data duplication, which can be critical for large datasets or performance-sensitive applications. Avoiding Copies: By using DVRs, you can manipulate the same data in memory without creating copies, which is especially useful for large arrays, clusters, or other complex data structures. This reduces memory usage and improves performance. Parallel Operations and Race Conditions: When multiple parallel operations (e.g., parallel loops or VIs) access the same DVR, there is a potential for race conditions if the access is not properly synchronized. LabVIEW provides the In-Place Element Structure to safely access and modify DVR data. This structure ensures that only one operation can read or write to the DVR at a time, preventing race conditions. Without this, simultaneous read/write operations could lead to unpredictable results or data corruption. Key Points to Add: Thread Safety: DVRs are not inherently thread-safe. You must use the In-Place Element Structure (or other synchronization mechanisms like semaphores) to avoid race conditions when multiple parallel tasks access the same DVR. Use Cases: DVRs are commonly used in scenarios where you need to share data between parallel loops, modules, or processes without copying, such as in real-time systems or when managing shared resources. Limitations: DVRs are only valid within the application instance where they are created, and the data they reference is freed when the reference is deleted or the application stops. --------------------- Before DVRs we typically had to resort to cloning of functional globals (VIs), but DVRs make this a little more dynamic and slick. You can have a single malleable VI operate on multiple types of DVRs too e.g., that opens up a lot of nice reuse. If you have an object that requires multiple circular buffers e.g. you can include circular buffer objects in the private data of that object, with the circular buffer objects containing a DVR to an array acting as that buffer... -------------------- Here is ChatGPT comparing functional globals with DVRs: Functional Globals (FGs) and Data Value References (DVRs) are both techniques used in programming (particularly in LabVIEW) to manage shared data, but they offer different approaches and have different strengths and weaknesses. FGs encapsulate data within a VI that provides access methods, while DVRs provide a reference to a shared memory location. Functional Globals (FGs): Encapsulation: FGs encapsulate data within a VI, often a subVI, that acts as an interface for accessing and modifying the data. This encapsulation can help prevent unintended modifications and promote better code organization. Control over Access: The FG's VI provides explicit methods (e.g., "Get" and "Set" operations) for interacting with the data, allowing for controlled access and potential validation or error handling. Potential for Race Conditions: While FGs can help avoid some race conditions associated with traditional global variables, they can still be susceptible if not implemented carefully, particularly if the access methods themselves are not synchronized. Performance: FGs can introduce some overhead due to the VI calls, but this can be mitigated by using techniques like inlining and careful design. Example: An FG could be used to manage a configuration setting, with a "Get Configuration" and "Set Configuration" VI providing access to the settings. Data Value References (DVRs): Shared Memory Reference: DVRs are references to a memory location, allowing multiple VIs to access and modify the same data. This is a more direct way of sharing data than FGs. Flexibility: DVRs can be used with various data types, including complex data structures, and can be passed as parameters to subVIs. Potential for Race Conditions: DVRs, like traditional globals, can be prone to race conditions if not handled carefully. Proper synchronization mechanisms (e.g., queues, semaphores, or action engines) are often needed to prevent data corruption. Performance: DVRs can be very efficient, especially when used with optimized data access patterns. Example: A DVR could be used to share a large array between different parts of an application, with one VI writing to the array and another reading from it. Key Differences and Considerations: Control vs. Flexibility: FGs offer more control over data access through their defined interface, while DVRs offer more flexibility in terms of the data types and structures that can be shared. Race Condition Mitigation: While both can be susceptible, FGs can be designed with built-in synchronization mechanisms (like action engines), while DVRs require explicit synchronization mechanisms to prevent race conditions. Performance Trade-offs: DVRs can offer better performance in many cases, especially when dealing with large data sets, but this can be offset by the complexity of managing synchronization. Code Readability and Maintainability: FGs can make code more readable and maintainable by encapsulating data access logic, but poorly designed FGs can also lead to confusion. In summary: Use Functional Globals when: You need controlled access to data, want to encapsulate data management logic, or need to ensure some level of synchronization. Use Data Value References when: You need to share data efficiently between multiple parts of your application, need flexibility in the data types you are sharing, or when performance is critical and synchronization can be handled externally. It's worth noting that in many cases, a combination of both techniques might be used to leverage the strengths of each approach. For example, a DVR might be used to share data, while a functional global (or an action engine) is used to manage access to that data in a controlled and synchronized manner.

There is no typos and errors in your posts. Only pearls of wisdom and oracles of truth that we mortals can't understand yet...

Hello everyone, I developed an Addons-Toolkit of LabVIEW, which achieves most of the OpenCV's APIs. It includes more than 2700 VIs, covering 13/15 modules of OpenCV (except flann and gapi) . You can use it to control cameras, process images, run DNN models and so on. Welcome to my CSDN blog to download and give it a try! (Chargeable, 30 days trial) Requirements: Windows 10 or 11, LabVIEW>=2018, 32 or 64 bits.

Had the same issue. Removing a VI from a lvlib, using Pane Relief to set splitter size and moving it back to the the lvlib worked for me to. Thanks!

C:\Program Files\NI\LVAddons\nivisa\1\vi.lib\_probes\default\VisaProbes.llb\VisaProbeInstr.vi

Top Level here almost certainly doesn't mean the diagram of the template VI. Instead LabVIEW distinguishes between a Top Level diagram which is basically the entire diagram window of a VI and sub diagrams such as each individual frame inside a case structure but also the diagram space inside a loop structure for instance. The tricky part may be that the diagram itself may indeed only exist once and remains the same even for clone VIs. The actual relevant part is the data space which is separate for each active clone (when you have shared clones) and unique for each clone (when you have pre-allocated clones).

In that case, I would suggest posting something here in case others want it in the future. I don't remember offhand where I used that API and a quick search didn't reveal anything.

Put the acquire image and save to file in the event structure timeout case, but only write to file conditionally (i.e. if the user has clicked the button)

A bit sad to have to say this nowadays that most of the traffic on this forum is about leaked videos, money rituals and human sacrifices, but isn't this the part where someone starts to repost links to basic LabVIEW training resources on the NI site?

C:\Program Files\National Instruments\LabVIEW 20xx\resource\PropertyPages\Pages\Format & Precision\pp_SetControlF&PString.vi Valid if no error.

In the LabVIEW community a phrase that has been used to describe undocumented, or incomplete features of LabVIEW has at times been called Rusty Nails. In searching LAVA it appear this is never explained and so this post is intended to give a brief history with as many details as I know having not been active when this all took place. The earliest reference to "Rusty Nails" found online (thanks to AQ) is by Greg McKaskle of NI in 1999. Someone was asking about all the undocumented INI settings that could be found, and how some weren't exposed to the Tools >> Options dialog. Greg's reply was this: Back in the LabVIEW 5.x and 6.x era there was a new emerging technology that was LabVIEW Scripting. NI had created scripting for their own purposes but the community saw it and wanted to be able to automate editing, or creating LabVIEW code. With the help from Jim Kring and others, the basic tools for enabling scripting in LabVIEW were available. The story of how this came about is worth a post of its own, but the summary is that NI shipped a VI that didn't have a password on the block diagram, which allowed for the creation of any object, given an ID. Using a for loop, you could easily create every object in LabVIEW, including objects which facilitate in creating and manipulating code. Discussing scripting often leads into discussing other INI keys which enable private functions like the well known SuperSecretPrivateSpecialStuff. It is possible this is one of the keys Greg was referring to. Other INI keys from 5.x can be found here. After these discoveries the NI forums started getting users asking about scripting, and private functions. Users were looking for help, and documentation but NI wasn't ready for this knowledge to be public and so they started deleting all posts related to private, and scripting functionality. Some of the motivation for the creation of LAVAG came about by a desire to have an independent place to discuss the LabVIEW topics that NI didn't want to have on the public forums, potentially adding to the number of support calls, and confusing new users with advanced topics that were undocumented or incomplete. After LAVA's creation a subforum section was labeled Rusty Nails, and intended to be a place to discuss Scripting, ExternalNodes, XNodes, Private methods, and general LabVIEW hackery. Over the years several private functions have been made public, and scripting has become an official feature shipping with LabVIEW. Because of this the Rusty Nails and XNodes subforums were combined into what is now the VI Scripting section. Even over on the official NI forums, discussions about private functionality and XNodes has been relaxed since those early days. Asking for private methods and getting unofficial help is something users, and sometimes NI employees will participate in, without the heavy censorship seen earlier. And topics of scripting are encouraged now that the feature has been official since LabVIEW 8.6. If you have anything you'd like me to add regarding scripting's history feel free to reply and I can add it. And if I got any of the details wrong let me know. Again I wasn't around when this all took place and I've just tried putting down the details I've heard from other developers.

i can't really answer your question but I suggest you watch this presentation :

Update To get it to work I had to downgrade to version 6.0.0.25 - OpenG File Library (from 6.0.2.28) 6.0.0.18 - OpenG Array Library (from 6.0.1.20) May be this helps someone else 🤷‍♂️ Thanks

There is a "best practices" document (this too) but I suspect you are looking for a less abstract set of guidelines.

I used LabVIEW to develop a toolkit for ATE software. The toolkit is called "Test bench Framework", which includes a test sequence editor and a test engine.This toolkit features the ability to execute several different sequences in parallel.If you are interested in this kit please contact me, thank you! This toolkit is over 10MB in file size and cannot be published on VIPM, so I uploaded it to Github.Test-Bench-Framework . I used the TestStand icon inside my own sequence editor and wondered if there would be any copyright issues involved.But it's not commercially available yet.

You can add text labels to a dial. It does not turn it into an enum but sort of works like you would expect (change the data type to U8).

I don't have good examples to share, but here are a few helpful links for you: NI has an article dedicated to DVRs, which also explains the fundamental idea: http://www.ni.com/product-documentation/9386/en/ Here is a short video that explains how to use a DVR and some of the pitfalls: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIWzjnkqz1Q Of course, you'll find lots of topics related to DVRs on this forum.

Here is a quick and dirty edit. It allows for column separators to be moved, but I noticed that on resize it will set the column widths. So this means if you manually move the columns, and then resize the control it may change the columns in an unexpected way. But at that point you can manually move the separators again. I only have 2017 and 2018 so this is for 2017 and newer now. Variant_Probe-2.4.3-0.ogp

Which is funny because when I took them, I thought the CLD was much harder than the CLA.

I used scripting and low-level VI editing to generate a VI with every single decoration object in LabVIEW, at least those with ID's 0 to -4096. There may be some out of that range (and many in that range don't have a valid image associated with them) but this range contains a lot of them. 0 to -4096.vi

Basically you need 2 more Property nodes if you want to keep your headers color. you must do what QueueYueue said first. Then : Active Cell.Active Column Number = -2 (this selects all columns) Active Item.Row Number = -1 (this selects the column headers) Active Cell.Background Color = Desired color Then : Active Cell.Active Column Number = -1 (this selects row header) Active Item.Row Number = -2 (this selects all rows) Active Cell.Background Color = Desired color

These are two separate issues: drag over not working, and drop deleting tree items. You can use the attached VI to copy a tree and event structure out of. What's important is that you have the old event ("Drop?", not "Drop"). You can replace the tree with a system tree as long as you right click on the tree and select Replace. Don't delete the tree. TreeWithDropEvent.vi

Sweet! That solves it. So, now we can write a LabVIEW console app! Here is the VI that let's you write to the StdOut of the calling console: Write to StdOut of Calling Parent.vi -John